this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
186 points (100.0% liked)

Labour

7759 readers
2 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

whywhywhywhywhy vote

che-cigar Votes are earned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure what this is about

Google how Gaddafi died and then what Hillary had to say about it, for one.

But what happened to the country was that it was bombed back to the stone age and what was once one of the better countries in Africa for the poor became one that has open air slave markets.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah ok, I don't defend that. I am not a Hillary apologist, I don't support U.S. colonialism. I simply think Republicans are worse for the well being of people that live in the U.S. than Democrats are. All else being equal, I prefer the party not actively trying to erase my existence. And I think organizing to make real change is less risky under Democrats (conservatives) than Republicans (fascists).

When it comes to international relations, I don't believe morality, cruelty, etc are really part of the calculation. It's all about power.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

I told you to look up Saddam's cause of death and Hillary's commentary on it for a reason. They weren't there for the sake of satisfying their personal cruelty, but that sure didn't stop them.

Virtually no policy is motivated by personal cruelty, foreign or domestic, all of it is about power. Rarely, a politician has a genuine personal bone to pick with someone they legislate against (see McCain vs Vietnam, I suppose), but generally these things should be analyzed on the level of material interests.