186
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Evilphd666@hexbear.net to c/labour@hexbear.net

whywhywhywhywhy vote

che-cigar Votes are earned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

I'd say your obfuscating by conflating politics and economics

You could say that, but only because you've fundamentally bought in to a right wing framing through belief a right wing propaganda tool.

Neither of us is the arbiter of truth

Ok? Thats a complete thought terminating cliche. No one has to be the sole arbiter of truth to say things that are true about our material reality.

I didn't invent the concept of political economy. If you think its obfuscation, take it up with the political theorists of the 17th and 18th centuries and the socialist theorists of the 19th who drew on their work.

I'm not inventing things and arbiting truth, im talking about actual theory and not propaganda models, that have clearly worked in your case.

Sure they are closely related and thus the X,Y graph, but they are not the same

This is the problem with the political compass, and its entire reason for existing. Its to decouple politics from economics and create a belief that some things are similar or related when they are not - a flattening of political understanding to render people illiterate.

The use of "authoritarianism" as an axis - a word that is not meaningfully definable - is only used to perpetuate the Cold War mythologies of communists being the same as nazis. Just like double genocide theory, this view of politics is ultimately nazi apologia.

On the reverse, it serves to legitimize "right libertarianism" by flattening peoples understanding to make it look like it has something in common with actual ideological traditions like anarchism. As a professed anarchist, you should abhor this flattening and equivocation and the model that promotes it. I'm not personally an anarchist, but i find it disgusting how they've sought legitimacy by trying to tie themselves to actual intellectual and political tendencies.

[-] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Fair argument, I disagree. Tools are for measuring things, disagreeing with something doesn't mean it shouldn't be learned about, measured, and viewed in context. If you have a better tool that contains virtually all positions without simply leaving out those you disagree with please show me.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I don't use any tool. Politics is not a grid or a spectrum, and there is no point forcing one on it, unless you want to increase political illiteracy.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
186 points (100.0% liked)

labour

7712 readers
1 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS