Lemmy

12531 readers

10 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

nutomic@lemmy.ml

would it be simpler for people if we said "server" instead of "instance"? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Die4Ever@programming.dev to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

or maybe some other terminology would be better? lots of people get confused when you ask them to choose an instance, sometimes I think even the word "proxy", "host", or "hub" is simpler

the specific terms aren't my point, just a discussion to see if we can come up with a better name

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

provider maybe?

[–] sadbehr@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Service provider? "Please select your Lemmy service provider".

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

that actually sounds like a good way to call them

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 4 points 1 year ago

"Provider" is the best alternative to "instance" I've seen. I'm down with provider.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I had thought of provider myself, people seem to be happy with having an email provider and it's not that different a concept.