this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
43 points (82.1% liked)

Lemmy

12531 readers
10 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

or maybe some other terminology would be better? lots of people get confused when you ask them to choose an instance, sometimes I think even the word "proxy", "host", or "hub" is simpler

the specific terms aren't my point, just a discussion to see if we can come up with a better name

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Rewording it doesn't really help.

Old adage...People don't want choices, they want what they want.

Every time you ask a question you lose a chunk of your audience. With something like lemmy, they want to look at messages and respond. Let them do that. Encourage them to choose an instance later, when they're equipped to make that choice.

Yes that's a hard problem with federation.. mastodon went for a default instance as a solution. There are likely better ones but that's a problem lots of people are working on.

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

mastodon can do default instances because they have the account migration process… i totally agree this is a great solution: get people in with sane defaults, and then let people move once they know how it works

there will be plenty of people that don’t move (or maybe that’s solvable too: analyse your toots and suggest a more niche instance after 2mo?) but i’m not sure that’s a huge problem if your “default instance” is more of a random choice from a list of sane defaults

[–] Die4Ever@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you're right about people making choices, but I still think the word choice matters, I've told people about Lemmy before and they always ask what an instance is

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you describe is catering to the marginal user: https://nothinghuman.substack.com/p/the-tyranny-of-the-marginal-user

Luckily the Fediverse doesn't have to grow at all costs and can aim for more long term goals.

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

yes and no… we don’t have revenue goals, but we have goals for the fediverse and we have the social media critical mass problem: you have to hit a critical mass before you become indispensable… if people try the fediverse and there’s not enough content, they tend to just leave rather than stick with it