this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
275 points (98.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers
93 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Even the Discord and Buymeacoffee page got taken down. This is larger than any other DMCA I know of

Edit: even the Telegram has been nuked. Yup, Telegram

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Question - What happens if we are hosting a Git repo ourselves, like using Gitea or something, and we receive a DMCA takedown request and we refuse? I mean, they can take down the domain, but what if weare hosting on a personal homeserver and keep changing domains whenever they take one down?

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then it's your choice to comply, call their bluff, or do whatever you want. I've seen people who doxxed the DMCA sender and made threats towards the sending agent (the hoster was Russian).

Though best course of action would be to comply or ignore it, don't do what that guy did, best to keep quiet than to stir up trouble.

Outright refusal or ignoring it does come with the risk of litigation (threats can accelerate it or lead to prosecution) assuming you're within their jurisdiction.

[–] Fullest@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Legally, you cannot refuse. DMCA is written such that the host must take down first and ask questions later.

[–] ninpnin@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They should upload the code on an .onion page

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But hiding an onion address's IP is very hard. No?

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

No. That's literally the point of it.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody would use the app then because nobody know of it and people would download viruses.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could make their own F-droid repository to be easily accessible to users

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't really fix the issue if it's only available over Tor or I2P.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The F-droid repository would be in the clear net I believe, I may be wrong, but it's way more unlikely that it would get shut down IMO, it doesn't get much traffic as a web page

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

That really doesn't change that they have to comply with DMCA requests.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then they would sue you and could get you in prison or at least you have to pay a very large fine. Possibly millions.