this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
653 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59329 readers
6303 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Detroit man steals 800 gallons using Bluetooth to hack gas pumps at station::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t know about that part. Just that it was all over the news when it happened here and I later read about the details as to how they did it.

I would have assumed the makers of the pumps would had put into them a little tighter security but then again look at some of these password and other web hacks we routinely see.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's a convergence of issues. First, and probably foremost, users are idiots. So it has to be able to be operated by a 5 year with a learning disability. Second, implementing security costs money up front. It is cheaper to let the customer deal with the fall out, then do damage control on the cheap, and keep going. Third, users can't be assed to access things that a 5 year old with learning and physical disabilities and a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in one hand can't access. These are all typical issues stuff is engineered towards. This is why you see this same basic issue crop up over and over again.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You'd be surprised how many times "good enough" is considered "good enough" when it comes to IT and security, even when it's really the bare minimum.