Asklemmy

43948 readers

520 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What has been the best therapy modality or style that has helped you with psychological issues (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by cheese_greater@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'd like to hear about people's most successful approaches or styles (even if unconventional), that helped them to overcome or at least get their various struggles under control.

So for example, Sinclair Method (naltrexone) [baclofen adjuvant] --> problem drinking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ianovic69@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if it's not harmful to others.

Well, if they can vote and spread misinformation then I see that as harmful to others.

[–] Rukmer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If someone stumbles across something like this and is influenced by it, I think odds are extremely great that they were already of a similar mindset. If it preached violence or bigotry or anytime I'd see more of an issue.

[–] ianovic69@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

already of a similar mindset.

Which is exactly why I bother. That mindset is by it's nature easily influenced, but it's not always permanent. Showing the huge issues with these type of comments plants seeds of doubt in the hope that anyone who's in that place is less easily convinced.

They aren't thinking straight and that's the way harmful ideologies take hold.

You can't reason someone away from a position they didn't reason themselves into.

[–] Paragone@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shove your gaslighting, ppl...

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9474-rewired-brain-revives-patient-after-19-years/

He grew a replacement corpus-callosum 'round the back of his brain.

"no evidence" is a lie.

Read Dr. Norman Doidge's books, if you've sufficient intellectual-integrity to do so:

https://www.amazon.com/Brains-Way-Healing-Discoveries-Neuroplasticity-ebook/dp/B00KWG9L2A/

https://www.amazon.com/Brain-That-Changes-Itself-Frontiers-ebook/dp/B000QCTNIW/

I spent several years much-of-the-time-intermittently-catatonic with brainloss, a few decades ago:

Recovery isn't mere-makebelieve, as Scientism so authoritatively asserts,

...and being gaslighted by people who are adamant that "no evidence exists" when it's staring them in the face, is insulting.

Scientism can go gaslight other people:

I know the difference between authority-based-"science", properly called Scientism, and ACTUAL-EVIDENCE-based Science.

[–] Paragone@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Here is an article which was included in John Brockman's book:

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25433

on how too-much "evidence-based" medicine isn't replicable.

I trust what TESTS to be true, as that is the best religion of all: empiricism.