537
for fucks sake rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Zekas@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wtf, do you have a source for this? Cause like I’m seeing all kinds of claims being thrown around on threads with no one providing sources.

ETA: Nonbiased sources. Not just the first article you find. If you don’t know if your source is nonbiased or not, you can always double check on mediabiasfactcheck.

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

But who honestly trusts mediabiasfactcheck?

[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I have been using them for years and have thus far not been steered wrong with nonbiased news sources. They explain in detail their reasoning for labeling a news source as well as explain the algorithm they use. And so far the only people I’ve come across who dont like them are people who prefer to be told how to feel instead of looking for facts.

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I just looked up a handful of news sources on there and was overall satisfied with their assessments. My assumption though is that even the "bias checkers" have to have their own internal bias.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
537 points (99.6% liked)

196

16440 readers
1639 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS