this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
400 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

48683 readers
401 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you’re confused why you can’t currently download Ubuntu 23.10 despite the fact it’s been released (and blogs like mine are telling you it’s out) there is a reason.

[From Twitter]: "We have identified hate speech from a malicious contributor in some of our translations submitted as part of a third party tool outside of the Ubuntu Archive. The Ubuntu 23.10 image has been taken down and a new version will be available once the correct translations have been restored."

Now, I’m not 100% certain but from poking around the Ubuntu Desktop Installer GitHub — I know, I’m nosey — appears to have been (sadly) the Ukrainian translation file that was hijacked. I ran the text through a translator and …Honestly, I wish I hadn’t.

It’s a broad range of offensive sentences touching on politics, sexuality, and current events. Though shocking, none of it is particularly coherent in scope. It seems to be written to be provocative for provocations sake – the sort of stuff people post on X to farm likes from far-right bots.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 191 points 1 year ago (12 children)

As an aside remark, it's really funny how everyone has to elaborate what the fuck they're talking about when they talk about Twitter.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter) Ubuntu explains the situation

could have just been written as

In a tweet, Ubuntu explains the situation

but the epic genius elon decided to destroy all brand recognition. Truly incredible thing to witness. Twitter literally got its own branded terms into common lexicon and he just set it all on fire.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He didnt just set the brand recognition on fire, elon basically did everything someone would do if they wanted to intentionally run twitter into the ground.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now spez needs to rename Reddit and make his idol proud.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In a Y (formerly known as post) on Y (formerly known as reddit) a Y (formerly known as user) "vaporeonpissdrinker69" has said that...

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Ycombinator looks around nervously

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

At least, vaporeon is compatible. In fact it is most compatible.

[–] palordrolap@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Perfect tagline for that site: "Y tho"

...and they replace the alien with the fellow in the meme (who was a Pope apparently. Who knew.)

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe that was his plan for creating true free speech, by driving everyone away from twitter to mastodon...

A very 200iq plan, only cost him $44B

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It cost him a lot more than that. He lost about 200 billion in stock value that he owned and among the companies he "runs" about a trillion was lost in total due to investers dumping stock after seeing his ineptitude on full display.

[–] tricoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a trillion

Wait, he was a trillionaire before? Interesting, now I'm curious what effects did this made to the economy, it would be a fun read (maybe).

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At those scales it's apparent that money is mostly imaginary.
$10 is $10 but a publicly traded tech company loses most of its value the moment you try to sell it, but that doesn't matter when the owner can "lose" 44 billion or 200 billion or a trillion or whatever and experience absolutely no change in his lifestyle.

[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Truly someone who is willing to go beyond his earthy wealth for his ideas of free speech.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No. The companies he controls at some level lost about a trillion in stock value combined

[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah probably, I am trying to be funny here haha.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or we all could just still call it twitter and tweets, and be done with it

[–] yiliu@informis.land 16 points 1 year ago

I propose we just stop talking about it altogether.

[–] MondayToFriday@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, It's called X now. Elon willed it so, and I'm happy to oblige. Posts are called X-cretions (or X-crement, if they are shitposts).

[–] palordrolap@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Well, he is allegedly fond of the poop emoji.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like we call meta Facebook and alphabet google. 💁🏻‍♀️

[–] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Facebook is still Facebook and Google is still Google, and they're owned by Meta and Alphabet, unlike X

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

What Google/Facebook did, while a little silly, at least makes some sense because they're segregating the product from the megacorp that owns the product. They maintain the benefits of having consistent branding while also separating out their corporate interests under a new name. In Google's case, Google still exists as a subsidiary of Alphabet, while in Facebook's case Facebook is not a separate company anymore but it still exists as just one of the platforms that Meta operates.

With X, the product itself was renamed, and in so doing the branding was destroyed. There's no good reason to do this as far as I can tell.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No no, it's not 'a tweet ' anymore, it's 'an X(, formerly known as a tweet)'

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"In an X(formerly known as a tweet) on X(formerly known as Twitter) ..."

It just rolls off the tongue!

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

The first X is pronounced Æsh

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Real "Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim" energy

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope this practice never dies.
(Also has "the artist formerly known as Prince vibes".)

[–] tricoro@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

The Prince one is different, since he changed his name to something that can't be even spelled.

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

The current branding gives more a placeholder asset feeling than a memorable identity. Sorry the twitter logo isn't loading so we'll show you an "X" in the meantime

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 7 points 1 year ago

Why read X posts when you can watch X videos

[–] authed@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] z500@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Xeet xeet, motherfucker

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

“In a xhit (…)”

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On some news stories I've been seeing them refer to it as "the social media company X"

@fadingembers
So the company x social that existed before the muskrat bought twitter then, right?
@GnuLinuxDude

[–] elxeno@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could just keep calling tweet, or tweet on X, maybe they just keep this shit to show how stupid the change is...

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

"in a recent Twix.."