281
submitted 11 months ago by snek@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] M500@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

I don’t really know anything about this stuff. What makes this worse than other things?

The article says Israel never signed anything saying they would not use it.

[-] angrymouse@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

These "forbidden" substances are usually too hard for a medic to treat and kill slowly. In this case, the thing stick and can burn till the bones, and even after the initial impact the remnants can still ignite. It is just a mess in the body.

[-] kibiz0r@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Upon contact, white phosphorus can burn people, thermally and chemically, down to the bone as it is highly soluble in fat and therefore in human flesh. White phosphorus fragments can exacerbate wounds even after treatment and can enter the bloodstream and cause multiple organ failure. Already dressed wounds can reignite when dressings are removed and the wounds are re-exposed to oxygen. Even relatively minor burns are often fatal. For survivors, extensive scarring tightens muscle tissue and creates physical disabilities. The trauma of the attack, the painful treatment that follows, and appearance-changing scars lead to psychological harm and social exclusion.

Just to reiterate, cuz it really sounds like some sci-fi alien shit:

Already dressed wounds can reignite when dressings are removed and the wounds are re-exposed to oxygen.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago

Think Napalm's meaner acidic cousin

[-] snek@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What makes this worse than other things?

I think it's good to read the article, they explain a lot of it and how Israel is refusing to comply with its ban as a weapon.


Sorry, you were right, it doesn't explain too much in the article, but this from HRW explains it in much better details: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/12/questions-and-answers-israels-use-white-phosphorus-gaza-and-lebanon

I caused confusion, it was my bad.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Read the article? Preposterous.

What's next? Reading up on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict before jumping to an unnuanced conclusion?

No thanks. I think we should cheerlead for who we consider the 'good guys' based on nothing more than tiktok videos and what anonymous people on twitter say.

[-] kcfb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Says the person who didn't even read the article thoroughly enough to catch OP's mistake before the edit. Everyone is always looking for a way to feel superior. 😂

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Reasons that the use of white phosphorous is considered worse than conventional munitions listed in the article (which you also didn't read):

... the use of such weapons puts civilians at risk of serious and long-term injury ... white phosphorus smokescreen munitions used during its 2008-2009 offensive in Gaza ... drew war crimes allegations ... Because it has legal uses, white phosphorus is not banned as a chemical weapon under international conventions, but it can cause serious burns and start fires. ... is considered an incendiary weapon under Protocol III of the Convention on the Prohibition of Use of Certain Conventional Weapons. The protocol prohibits using incendiary weapons against military targets located among civilians, although Israel has not signed it and is not bound by it.

The HRW article goes into a bit more detail about how severe these serious injuries are, what happened during the 2008-2009 offensive that drew war crimes allegations, and Israel's current stance on the use of white phosphours.

You're welcome.

[-] Bread@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Preposterous? Didn't you read it? It says white phosphorus. Big difference! /s

[-] FederatedSaint@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

All I know is that there was a little fighting before, and now there is a lot of fighting.

BAD! BAD FIGHTING!

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Chemical rounds meant to cause injury are banned in the Geneva convention. It's not a separate treaty.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If it's being used as a smokescreen, a very common use, there is nothing at all bad about it.

Edit: People seem to think that it's common use as a smoke screen is a problem. What, specifically, is the issue when it is being used as a smokescreen?

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
281 points (94.6% liked)

News

22910 readers
3605 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS