Linux

48077 readers

760 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

203

Overview: How UEFI Secure Boot Works in Linux (tiffybelle.vivaldi.net)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by TiffyBelle@feddit.uk to c/linux@lemmy.ml

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Been down the rabbit hole lately of UEFI Secure Boot issues, and decided to write an overview of how it works out-of-the-box in the excellent Debian-based Linux Mint LMDE 6.

Have mostly been researching this stuff as I was looking to replace GRUB entirely with systemd-boot on one of my systems. Will likely write a follow-up piece documenting that journey if I think it'd be interesting to some nerds out there.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Laser@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

First, I'd personally always opt for systemd-boot instead of GRUB when I have the choice. GRUB is just very complex and systemd-boot rather simple.

Getting Secure Boot to work isn't always trivial, especially since mainboards and TPMs don't always document how enrolling your own keys works.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Hard same. systemd-boot is about as tricky as, say, syslinux (which I used to use) to get working, which is itself far simpler to work with than GRUB ever was.

[–] saltedpenguin@artemis.camp 1 points 1 year ago

personally for me, grub beaks when sdax changes but, in systemd boot doesn't. this is my main reason to prefer it. easy access to boot configuration is a plus i guess.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

GRUB is just very complex and systemd-boot rather simple.

Well, except the Systemd part. Efistub or Refind it is for me.

[–] Laser@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

systemd-boot is basically gummiboot with an interface to systemd so that the latter can get information on boot time in firmware and stuff. I prefer a boot loader instead of Efistub because it allows easier configuration of boot options etc. but it just comes down to personal preference