As a society, we need an open source device for reading. Books are among the most important documents of our culture, yet the most popular and widespread devices we have for reading are closed objects, operating as small moving parts in a set of giant closed platforms whose owners' interests are not always aligned with readers'.

The Open Book aims to be a simple device that anyone can build for themselves. The Open Book should be comprehensible: the reader should be able to look at it and understand, at least in broad strokes, how it works. It should be extensible, so that a reader with different needs can write code and add accessories that make the book work for them. It should be global, supporting readers of books in all the languages of the world. Most of all, it should be open, so that anyone can take this design as a starting point and use it to build a better book.

Check out the promo video as well:
https://youtu.be/vFD9V8Hh7Yg

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Emanuel 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideally, how would open source hardware look like for you? I mean that as in after it has achieved something akin to mainstream adoption.

[–] nossaquesapao 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is a great question. I don't believe it can reach the point of any person simply being able to create their own hardware, unless we're talking about an utopic future with multimaterial 3d printing in small scale, but I can see small businesses being able to manufacture custom open source hardware on demand, based on open standards. For me, the ideal scenario would be something like going into an open hardware service shop and asking for a device with your requirements, and they creating it for you, or repairing/upgrading yours.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like with skating, many shops can provide you with wheels, decks, gear. Amazon can sell their one-piece e-books at loss, but eventually it can turn to modular open design where nothing is irreplaceable. It's a matter of demand. If there could be a good project and something like a big org or a government programm funding it, it would end well. Like, supplying troubled communities with an e-reader? If only there wouldn't be DRM fuckery, it's golden.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

to modular open design where nothing is irreplaceable.

It adds interesting aspects. For example, I work with systems that have 5 I/O modules. Each one keeps a backup of the main controller settings, so that you can replace any component, including the controller.

After a quick question on the next boot, you're up and running again.

Imagine if each module of your ebook reader had enough cheap/slow storage that everything in "main storage" could be replicated across your modules. As long as you only replace a couple of modules at a time, you'd have everything forever.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't seem super utopic to think a 3d printer could make a pcb, dispense solder paste, pick and place, and heat it to solder it.

Making the ICs themselves on the other hand...

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Risc-v to the rescue in the CPU space.

Although I'd say there are big gains if current off the shelf ics are used, even if purists wouldn't call the whole endeavor open source.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Community-owned chip foundries could make it happen.