this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
61 points (90.7% liked)

GenZedong

4289 readers
85 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Max Blumenthal also posted a few articles that seemed to tacitly suggest that green energy and climate change are hysteric concerns.

[โ€“] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Link the articles, because green washing is a real problem. Libs keep throwing money at electric cars and slightly greener luxury products that are still horrible (5% less bad yearly-iPhone upgrade), and attack things like diesel buses in cases where an introduction of a diesel bus will not only be net reduction, but a reduction even compared to buying a brand new electric bus from an imperial core country.

I mean I don't know, I strongly disagree with his anti-vax stance, and so it's not crazy to imagine that he'd have some bad opinion on climate change, but I also absolutely understand groaning when listening to two-faced north libs say the way to solve climate change is LNG.

[โ€“] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I never said that green-washing wasn't a problem or an important issue, my issue is that Max Blumenthal seemed to disregard all of that actual science and just throw it in the trash.

I might have misremembered, I thought this story was written by Blumenthal, or I might be confusing it with another:

https://thegrayzone.com/2022/12/08/dutch-farmers-technocratic-plan/

[โ€“] chocoraisinboi@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So its wrong that dutch farmers arent ok with a neoliberal agenda that will most likely sell their land to black rock?

If this is it then it's a weak argument to take him down with

[โ€“] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

The thing the article is complaining about is evil climate regulation trying to stop industrial agriculture (which greatly pollutes and robs the soil while requiring vast inputs).

[โ€“] Buchenstr@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

These protests were funded by agricultural corporations to fight government environmental regulations, these hogs can really go fuck themselves for all I care.

Most western european farmers are bourgeois traitors who would gladly sell their country out to blackrock if it meant they got a few hundred quid in their bank.

[โ€“] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I am half-awake so please bare with me, but unless I misread it, those farmers seemed more concerned about their profits than the environment is my point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)