this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
33 points (90.2% liked)
Open Source
31182 readers
315 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Phoning home isn't necessarily a bad thing (but I agree that it shouldn't do it without express consent) because a lot of app development nowadays is supported by analytics. Crash reports, A/B testing, feature discoverability, etc.
If anything, I generally trust FOSS projects that ask for analytics more than I trust the typical data farm.
the unique id is probably also not meant to be sinister either but that's definitely more of a red flag than phoning home in principle imo
Phoning home in snitching. It is unacceptable as you said unless authorized by the user and should never be configured by default. I really tell people to fire up Wireshark and see what Firefox does, and yes in includes analytics 3rd parties even after a TON of tweaks and stuff disabled.
How can this be even acceptable, whatever they say, they're simply serializing every instance of the app it will eventually get into some crash report, log or 3rd party analytics company...