729

Somehow paying for Netflix is fine but god forbid I want to watch a 10 hour loop of the DS9 intro without ads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nnjethro@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It includes youtube music. And creators you watch get more money than if you watched using the ad supported version.

[-] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  • You also get to play video with a screen off on mobile

  • You also get to download for offline viewing

  • You also support the creators of the videos, not just google.

  • AND FFS YOU DONT GET ADS.

Using adblock isnt some innate human right. They are well within their rights to block adblock.

You get almost the whole worlds information for free in video form. You can be entertained or use it as a teaching tool. It is the best place at this point for product demos and reviews. It is a crazy wealth of information and infrastructure that everyone takes advantage of and somehow just expect to be free. If Google cancells it because it is not profitable, i would bet the efficiency of the entire human race takes a significant nose dive. It also probably runs one of the highest sets of data storage and encoding on the planet.

[-] K3zi4@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Can do all of those things without premium if you have the right apps.

But besides that, absolutely not. I remember when YouTube was free with no ads, I remember when the adverts first started appearing, and that's when it became obvious that they were trying to annoy you into a pay model. It took a little longer than expected, but sure enough, they ramped up the ads until "YOUTUBE PREMIUM! PAY FOR NO ADVERTS!"

Fuck that, I had no adverts before and they took that away. But the worst part is that they harvest my private data and make money from me already. As far as I'm concerned, that's my subscription to their shit, in their perverse data selling.

No fucking way I'm going to also pay them for the privilege to have my private data sold.

[-] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So.. you dont like the service.. just dont use it at all anymore. Then they cant track your data as well.

[-] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's almost like they were bleeding money and needed to at least break even.

[-] TwoCubed@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

You also get videos crammed full with sponsors. One might say that most videos on YouTube are ads themselves. YT Premium does not have Sponsorblock. Alphabet makes money by selling your data and they continue to do so when you pay them. I support a select few creators via Patreon. Fuck Alphabet, they're not getting a single cent from me.

[-] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, ffs. You dont see that the reason you "need" sponsorblock is because we used adblock so much that the only way the creators could make a living was injecting their own adds into their own videos.

The money youtube makes from selling your data does not cover the cost of running the business.

What about all the creators of videos you watched that you dont support on patreon? They dont deserve anything for their work?

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Ok a few points.

  1. Youtube is in their right to show ads and shove them in my face. They can also try to block my adblocker. Their platform their rules.

  2. Youtubers adding sponsors into their Video is because Youtube does not pay them for the ads that are shown, or at least not fairly. Also because people want to earn money with Youtube which is partially a problem in the first place.

  3. Yes youtube is expensive to run and they have been in the minus for years, but just as they make profit they go all the way and force you into Premium! They can try that but it's in my right to use the Service with adblock and sponsorblock until they go to a subscription only Service.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Using adblock isnt some innate human right. They are well within their rights to block adblock.

Well, they're free to try

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

So, some basic features that you can/used to get by just using a web browser, and soemthing that you can do directly via Patreon.

Definitely value for money.

[-] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Not all creators have patreon. Also are you using patreon to pay google?

Seems like premium with extra steps?

[-] HerbalGamer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I have all those things with ReVanced

[-] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Revanced pays the content creators and google for your usage?

[-] ComplacentGoat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

People are ridiculous sometimes. These companies aren't going to eat millions of dollars per day in hosting costs to appease the minority who expect everything to just be given to them.

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

I kinda want Google to just cancel YouTube. Shit would be hilarious. Also sad and we would lose soooooo much information. But still I kinda just want to see what happens. What new players enter the game, will the monopoly be broken? Though I'm sure Microsoft, Amazon, and other big boys would roll their own versions of YouTube and effectively there would not be a difference, just a small amount of fragmentation.

But still...

[-] dmrzl@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

According to the Lemmy community the folks over at selfhosting will just spawn an international CDN on their raspberry pis and deliver my 5 hour, 400GiB Starfield all categories speedrun recording for free out of good will. Right?

[-] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The fact the guy above you has been downvoted, and you are upvoted makes me think people dont see this comment is clearly sarcastic.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I thought YouTube music was a separate subscription?

[-] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~It is not, unless they perhaps have a YT Music-only subscription but I haven't seen such.~~

Edit: It looks like there is a YT Music Only subscription available, for $3/mo cheaper. I'd still say if you use YouTube any more than just on one-off occasions, its still worth picking up regular YT Premium if you're grabbing the music one anyways, but at least the option is there.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

... I don't know where I got this idea. And I just got another month of Spotify too. Isn't there an easy way to transfer your playlists over there?

[-] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 4 points 1 year ago

As far as I'm aware, none of the music services really have a direct transfer option available. You pretty much have to use a third party service to do so from what I found the last time I tried to do a major switch.

Funnily enough, I feel like this is one of those things that are present day "AI" could probably help with, if it were integrated with these services. Realistically you'd just need something to do some OCR of images from your playlists, and match the results - I'm kind of surprised that's not something Spotify, Google, etc have done yet.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Awesome thanks!

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

As mentioned, third party services are there

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

There was a YouTube music only tier I was on when I moved from Google Play Music. Eventually I figured out about YouTube Premimum including the music so I changed to that

[-] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, interesting, you're correct there does appear to be one which looks to be $3 cheaper. I'll edit my comment to reflect that, thanks!

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
729 points (94.5% liked)

Risa

6881 readers
330 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS