102
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
102 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
58144 readers
4368 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I don't really see the merit in these cases.
If I read a book in the library (so not even purchasing it) and have some great idea... Take it to market and make billions off of it. The Author has no stake in my financial success. Why would this be any different for ChatGPT or other AI products? If I write a summary of a book, and post it online for a journal/website and I make some ad revenue from it... I'm also protected and there is no recourse for the original author.
Copyright laws always protects derivative works. Anything and everything that ChatGPT would create would be derivative.
Yeah tbh I don’t think any sane person does. So what people who first taught them to read deserve a cut?
Some philosophers believe you cannot imagine something that does not currently exist. All your thoughts and “creativity” are a slave to it.
But in true economy, there’s going to be litigation and money will be made because money always has to be made. This seems akin to the patent trolls some years back. And the RIAA well before that.