this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
875 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3380 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1874605

A 17-year-old from Nebraska and her mother are facing criminal charges including performing an illegal abortion and concealing a dead body after police obtained the pair’s private chat history from Facebook, court documents published by Motherboard show.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For all of those saying Facebook was just complying with the law- there is absolutely no reason for Facebook to have access to its users' private information. The company I work for can't do anything with a customer's account unless they give us the password. We can't see anything they have saved there. All of the private stuff they have is private and even if a court ordered us to show it to them, we literally couldn't comply.

We're a small company and we can do it. A company the size of Meta can certainly do it.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't you just look at the data in. The database though? No need to login as the user. Surely not every field is hashed

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a good point and I don't know the answer to that (my guess is encryption is involved), but as other people have pointed out, Facebook has an alternate encrypted messaging service, WhatsApp, so Facebook is clearly capable of not being able to access its users' messages.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, based on Signal's protocol. Signal is the only messaging app I use.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can do it because you're a small company. Get enough attention, and the FBI will force you to decrypt on demand. They've done it before and the supreme court backed them up. Do it over seas and expect your US traffic to get blocked, if they don't raid your offices.

[–] EricHill78@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is untrue. The FBI tried to get Apple to decrypt a shooter's iPhone in Florida a few years back and they wouldn't budge.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

This isn’t quite right…

Apple didn’t have the means to decrypt the information, but it was within their ability to do (by writing code to do so.)

But asking a company for the unencrypted data, and forcing a company to produce a new application, are completely different things.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WhatsApp, Signal and Telegram don't have that issue.

[–] ModdedPhones@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Signal yes, WhatsApp yes but not the meta data, telegram only if explicitly set to encrypted otherwise no.