57
Facebook owner Meta faces EU ban on targeted advertising
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37601 readers
490 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Users get a service, so it can be argued they are paid in kind. That's the price of their "free" services.
Whether you agree with that or not, websites are unlikely to pay users to use their services (unless they're at least providing content) any more than a coffee shop would pay its customers to drink their coffee.
It's non negotiable. I'm always going to use every tool I can to block tracking networks.
If they respond by not letting me use the service... that's fine I'll find a competitor. But in my experience that's pretty rare. Usually they're happy to let people use their service even if they can't track some people.
The only real road block I've ever seen is occasionally a service will ask me to prove I'm not a robot. I rarely bother with proof - just close the tab and switch to an alternative that doesn't do that garbage.
The coffee shop isn’t getting paid by someone besides the customer for them to drink the coffee
Unless they’re doing some pharmaceutical beta testing without us knowing, which would then be more in line with how we’re treated by meta