this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
141 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
494 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone might live in a country where such fees are illegal.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

SWIM lives in such a country, and recently got hit by a "virtual fee" for account inactivity. Since it isn't a "real fee", it doesn't increase debt, which would be illegal, but the bank will still happily apply it the moment SWIM were to ever put any money in the account.

SWIM looked around the web, and there are more people who got hit with that out of the blue... after they apparently introduced the "functionality" in 2018, but decided to "delay it" until 2023 because of COVID and stuff.

Calling it a "virtual fee" and just letting them sit there without doing anything, allows the entity to claim having more clients than they actually have, and look like it's being owed more that it will ever get paid.