this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
59 points (95.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35737 readers
1062 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Seeing that they need quite a lot of clean water, which is not widely available everywhere during the entire year in big amounts, especially with these droughts due to climate change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's many different nuclear reactor designs

For the traditional ones that require lots of cooling water, oceans are typically used so they don't suffer from droughts. If you actually need fresh water you have desalinization available, and nuclear power can power that.

There are more self-contained designs, as you would see on ships.

They're also some hands-off designs that generate low amounts of power over a long period of time used for remote installations.

[–] hulemy@ani.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would the hypothetical nuclear fusion power plant require less water? And do you think that when we finally find out how to do it, a fusion based design will become widespread?

[–] CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi 10 points 1 year ago

Fusion designs currently require a ton of water for cooling (first wall and divertor) beyond what is needed for electricity production.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're asking me to speculate about a hypothetical. Depending on the type of nuclear fusion that actually comes to be .... maybe.

Regardless of the fusion process itself, which might require prodigious amounts of heavy water or maybe even normal water I don't know.

There's what do you do with the heat, so in a traditional power plant, you generate heat, the heat is used to create steam, and the steam is used then generate electricity or do other types of useful mechanical work. This could be a closed circuit design, but it might be easier to have open circuits if you have available water. But once the water, steam has done the work, you might have to recycle it recapture it, cool it down. IE evaporative towers...

Could you build a nuclear power plant, or even a fusion power plant, that runs in the desert? Yes probably. Would it be more expensive than the equivalent plant near water source? Yes of course...

[–] hulemy@ani.social 4 points 1 year ago

Ah, that you for your detailed response

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Look at Helion. Their tech is kinda great and shows a lot of promise. Their fusion implementation dispenses with the whole "boil water to spin a turbine" method of power generation entirely. They rely on induction and the strong magnetic flux that the fusion process releases to directly convert the fusion process into electricity. Honestly, is is pretty genius. Further reading: Their patants Technology Review article