this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1680 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

10923 readers
2002 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 84 points 1 year ago (9 children)

i hope someday we construct a collider that spans the entire circumference of the earth. But we'd probably have to build one that spans the circumference of the moon first, and then maybe mars, since the oceans are going to be a bit of a doozie to work around that we don't have the technology for, whereas the interior of a collider is supposed to be evacuated, so, the moon almost kinda already handles that for us. heat might be an issue of course, but if we can figure out thermal radiator panels that can dump the heat straight into space, maybe we could pull it off...

mars would address the heat issues, but those dust storms are no joke and the dust itself is microscopic toxic/caustic razors and it'll try to get in everywhere and ruin fine instruments it touches. Moon dust is also really bad but there's no wind to kick it up on the moon obviously...

but damn. DAMN. imagine the fucking science we could get done with a LUNAR-SCALE PARTICLE COLLIDER!!!

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Halo

Just gonna throw that out there

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

Master Chief, we need you for one last mission >!bro!<

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fuck it, orbital collider. Earth deserves a cool ring

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Encircling the Sun

[–] italien@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

queue halo theme

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta build it as an orbital ring.

[–] victron@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, maybe add some biomes, oceans and wildlife. And absolutely no parasitic life forms trapped in there.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Hear me out okay. hits blunt Dyson ring. Maybe we start building it out between earth and Mars. We dig a big ass hole into Mars core and use some kind of laser technology to focus radiation into it perhaps "jump starting" the core. Or maybe we use some kind of cable and gymbal system to run a hard wire into it. hits blunt Then meanwhile we're crashing comets and shit into it to get us some oceans and atmosphere, badabing badaboom we got earth 2.0

[–] victron@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should put that blunt down, buddy.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well check this out: if it's big enough and can collect enough solar energy, it can be a self-powered gargantuan electromagnet and CREATE a magnetosphere for Mars itself. And the moon has a higher silver content than earth, which a) won't tarnish in the vacuum of space and b) is more conductive than copper or gold!

Aluminum alloy structures, silver circuitry, we could build this thing without sending ANY of it's raw materials from earth. It's all already up there waiting for us... ... Some assembly required :p

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry I'm just now seeing this reply because that is fascinating

[–] Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Moon’s daytime is half a month long and can reach 120 C so we’d need some pretty powerful heat shielding. And there’s no ozone layer to protect the electronics from radiation, and I’m pretty sure the Moon orbits outside of Earth’s magnetosphere. And the shielding used for such a project could also be used to fix climate change here (and terraform Venus later) with orbital parasols. And whatever unimaginable technology we’d need for such an ambitious project may as well be used to run a grid of electromagnets and power lines across Mars to give it a magnetic field

[–] Mohaim@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most proposals for moon colonies are either built underground or covered up with a thick layer of regolith for both of the reasons you mentioned. It's very likely a collider would also be built underground for the same reasons. Digging a many-miles-long tunnel on the moon with the awful properties of moon regolith to deal with would have its own set of challenges though.

[–] Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah. I hear NASA and India are planning to send 3d-printer robots to lava caves to seal them off, cover/get rid of all moon dust and build permanent bases there (but as of now the priority seems to be researching the polar water-ice and using moon rocks to study what the early solar system’s geology was like)

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

There's probably opportunity to do some really large colliders in space, for much cheaper than on any celestial body.

But then, people are having a really hard time imagining the fucking science we could get done with a lunar-scale particle collider. That's why the merely 100km one isn't getting any money.

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If gravatons are a real particle, we'd need one on on the order of earths orbit around the sun to see it. Maybe someday lol.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Or a different mechanism of detection,

[–] rckclmbr@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Why do we need to do it around a planet? Origin of Halo confirmed

[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Linear collider to Proxima Centauri

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think on earth is preferential, and you'd have to build it underground anyways in order to shield it from interference.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think on earth is preferential

Something something "resonance cascade."

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Even underground there is tons of issues. One for example is that the ground is having tides.

As the moon passes above is the ground is moving by several cm so it has to be compensated by the collider.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

At the energies involved, it's akin to a bacteria interfering with a supersonic goods train. The only bit that needs shielding is the detector systems, and that's not THAT hard to do in space. At least if you're at the point of building a space based accelerator.