1
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml to c/communism@lemmygrad.ml

U.S. President-elect Joe Biden has appointed veteran transgender Shawn Skelly to the transition team that will evaluate the Department of Defense.

Shawn Skelly holds a master's degree in national security and strategic studies from the Naval War College. She worked for 20 years in the U.S. Navy, where she held the position of naval flight officer and retired as commander. She worked in the military conflicts conducted by the United States in the Middle East, such as the Afghanistan War and the Iraq War. Between 2013 and 2016, she held the positions of executive secretary and special assistant in the Department of Defense, being responsible for meeting urgent requests from U.S. military personnel acting in military interventions conducted by the Obama administration.

Shawn Skelly's appointment is a prime example of how identity causes are co-opted by U.S. liberals to interdict criticism and to clothe the most perverse aspects of imperialism with an air of progressiveness. There is certainly no shortage of trans professionals who excel in areas such as culture, education, health, and human rights who could coordinate positive initiatives for integration and emancipation. But the priority is to link identity politics and progressiveness to the idea of being able to send transsexuals to kill and die for the interests of the US plutocracy. It is an extremely effective way to block discussion of imperialism and interventionism and demobilize sectors of the liberal left and the identity movements, which prefer to turn a blind eye or even defend the agenda of interventionism if it is covered by the false varnish of identity politics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Makan@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 years ago

Very well said.

I think we should draw a line with between liberal identity politics and trans liberation from a communist perspective. But the problem is even more crucial: liberalism has no multi-faceted analysis of the problems that the people at large are dealing with. Often, we hear "race" or "gender" or "identity" but hardly do we hear about "class." I've recently been reading a book called Caste by Isabel Wilkerson and while it has a lot to say about racism, it says that the issue of "class" can easily be rectified by hard work and "decisions." And then it doesn't touch on the subject again.

I understand that one shouldn't be a "class reductionist," but I find that liberals are essentially "identity reductionist;" there is no class analysis whatsoever.

[-] felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I understand that one shouldn’t be a “class reductionist,” but I find that liberals are essentially “identity reductionist;” there is no class analysis whatsoever.

Perfectly stated. This does not mean we shouldn't take care of trans workers. It's literally the opposite, we should actually take care of them, and bring them to our side, because their identity is being used to shield genocidal public officials from criticism. It's an awful situation to be in.

In a way, identity politics in the US have become borderline "identity fascism" at some point. Just notice how certain liberals are quick to denounce working people as fascists for voting for Trump, while criticism against Joe Biden is quickly shut down. One recurrent aspect of fascism is the absolute lack of a safe space to criticize the current state of things.

This is why communists promote freedom to criticize.

“The Communist Party does not fear criticism because we are marxists, the truth is on our side.”
— Mao Zedong

[-] T34@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 years ago

Yeah, agreed. We need a proletarian identity politics. Because identity really only matters in the working classes.

The US even had Black slave owners. There were probably liberals back then trying to use them as examples of progress. Diversity within the bourgeoisie doesn't help us.

We shouldn't look at the enslavers, we should look at who's enslaved. Don't look at the bombers but who's being bombed. Who's being killed in prisons and concentration camps, who's being killed by their water. It's working-class POC every time.

Labour cannot emancipate itself in the white skin where in the black it is branded.

Proletarian identity politics is about worker solidarity and worker emancipation. Getting diverse bourgeois imperialists to bomb the workers is the opposite of that.

[-] Makan@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 years ago

The US has had blacks that supported apartheid in Africa like it was just another foreign policy decision in the name of fighting communism worldwide. I'm reading about this right now, actually, in a book called White Supremacy Confronted by Gerald Horne. I'm not saying that blacks and Latinos and Native Americans (especially Native Americans) and so on don't have it rough, but I won't accept the crocodile tears of a black Trump supporter, for example.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2020
1 points (100.0% liked)

Communism

9427 readers
1 users here now

Discussion Community for fellow Marxist-Leninists and other Marxists.

Rules for /c/communism

Rules that visitors must follow to participate. May be used as reasons to report or ban.

  1. No non-marxists

This subreddit is here to facilitate discussion between marxists.

There are other communities aimed at helping along new communists. This community isn't here to convert naysayers to marxism.

If you are a member of the police, armed forces, or any other part of the repressive state apparatus of capitalist nations, you will be banned.

  1. No oppressive language

Do not attempt to justify your use of oppressive language.

Doing this will almost assuredly result in a ban. Accept the criticism in a principled manner, edit your post or comment accordingly, and move on, learning from your mistake.

We believe that speech, like everything else, has a class character, and that some speech can be oppressive. This is why speech that is patriarchal, white supremacist, cissupremacist, homophobic, ableist, or otherwise oppressive is banned.

TERF is not a slur.

  1. No low quality or off-topic posts

Posts that are low-effort or otherwise irrelevant will be removed.

This is not a place to engage in meta-drama or discuss random reactionaries on lemmy or anywhere else.

This includes memes and circlejerking.

This includes most images, such as random books or memorabilia you found.

We ask that amerikan posters refrain from posting about US bourgeois politics. The rest of the world really doesn’t care that much.

  1. No basic questions about marxism

Posts asking entry-level questions will be removed.

Questions like “What is Maoism?” or “Why do Stalinists believe what they do?” will be removed, as they are not the focus on this forum.

  1. No sectarianism

Marxists of all tendencies are welcome here.

Refrain from sectarianism, defined here as unprincipled criticism. Posts trash-talking a certain tendency or marxist figure will be removed. Circlejerking, throwing insults around, and other pettiness is unacceptable.

If criticisms must be made, make them in a principled manner, applying Marxist analysis.

The goal of this subreddit is the accretion of theory and knowledge and the promotion of quality discussion and criticism.

Check out ProleWiki for a communist wikipedia.

Communism study guide

bottombanner

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS