Preclassic-Classic Zapotec Civilization
The Zapotecs, known as the 'Cloud People', live in the southern highlands of central Mesoamerica, specifically, in the Valley of Oaxaca, which they inhabited from the late Preclassic period to the end of the Classic period (500 BCE - 900 CE). Their capital was first at Monte Albán and then at Mitla, they dominated the southern highlands, spoke a variation of the Oto-Zapotecan language, and profited from trade and cultural links with the Olmec, Teotihuacan and Maya civilizations.
The Zapotecs grew from the agricultural communities which grew up in the valleys in and around Oaxaca. In the Preclassic period they established fruitful trade links with the Olmec civilization on the Gulf Coast which allowed for the construction of an impressive capital site at Monte Albán and for the Zapotec to dominate the region during the Classic period.
By the late Preclassic period Zapotec cities show a high level of sophistication in architecture, the arts, writing and engineering projects such as irrigation systems. For example, at Hierve el Agua there are artificially terraced hillsides irrigated by extensive canals fed by natural springs. Evidence of contact with other Mesoamerican cultures can be seen, for example, at the site of Dainzu, which has a large stone-faced platform with reliefs showing players of the familiar Mesoamerican ball game wearing protective headgear. We also know of very close relations between the Zapotec and the peoples based at Teotihuacan in the Basin of Mexico. Indeed, at Teotihuacan there was even a quarter of the city specifically reserved for the Zapotec community.
Decline
Quite why the city and the Zapotec civilization collapsed at Monte Albán is not known, only that there is no trace of violent destruction and that it was contemporary with the demise of Teotihuacan and a general increase in inter-state conflict. The site continued to be significant, though, as it was adopted by the later Mixtec as a sacred site and place of burial for their own kings. The Zapotecs did not disappear completely, however, for in the early Post-Classic period they established a new, smaller centre at Mitla, known to them as Lyobaa or 'Place of Rest' which also had many fine buildings including the celebrated Hall of the Columns. The site continued to be occupied even up to the Spanish conquest.
Languages
Zapotec is an extensive language family indigenous to southern Mexico, which belongs to the larger Otomanguean family. Today, there are over 50 different Zapotec languages most of which are endangered. They are spoken primarily in the state of Oaxaca, Mexico, by a total of approximately 425,000 people within a much larger Zapotec ethnic community. Due to emmigration, there are now Zapotec speakers in many other parts of Mexico and the United States. Dialectal divergence between Zapotec-speaking communities is extensive and complicated. Many varieties of Zapotec are mutually unintelligible with one another. The Zapotec language family is on par with the Romance language family in terms of time depth and diversity of member languages.
Modern day
The population is concentrated in the southern state of Oaxaca, but Zapotec communities also exist in neighboring states. The present-day population is estimated at approximately 400,000 to 650,000 persons, many of whom are monolingual in one of the native Zapotec languages and dialects.
The Zapotec population is divided into four geographic areas, each with its own cultural differences: 1) Central Valleys; 2) Sierra Norte; 3) Sierra Sur; and the 4) Isthmus of Tehuantepec. The geographic isolation of these populations, caused by centuries of conquest and colonization, has resulted in very significant linguistic diversity within the population, so much that often one town adjacent to another says or writes the same words and expressions differently.
The Zapotec of the Sierra Juárez, as countrymen of Benito Juárez, were very much involved in the Reform Movement of 1860, some in defense of liberal ideas, while others interested in conserving church traditions. They were also involved in the Mexican Revolution, forming the first textile and mining labor unions.
Beginning in 1872, there was a revival in the exploitation of gold and silver in the region that attracted mestizos and accelerated the process of language replacement. Between 1900 and 1940, the mining frontier in the District of Ixtlán included Ixtlán, Guelatao, and many other communities. Spanish became the language of instruction for the indigenous young receiving education.
Mining brought wealth to some of the native people, but caused the depletion of the mineral resources and the environmental destruction of the natural environment by the removal of forests for firewood and the contamination of rivers with toxic wastes.
Since the end of the 19th century the cultivation of coffee brought further capitalization to the Zapotec and mestizo communities.
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- ❤️ Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 💖 Come talk in the New Weekly Queer thread
- 💛 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- 💚 Come and talk in the Daily Bloomer Thread
- ⭐️ September Movie Nominations ⭐️
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
What is carding in this context? Carding wool?
Also pretty much anything is fair game if the alternative is starving.
Credit cards. Back when I used to read more about it, up to about 2015, the most anonymous entry point was to buy and install skimmers on automated points-of-sale like gas pumps and vending machines. Idk what if anything has changed since then, but I know there are always more cameras than there used to be
Eh. Sketchy bc you're going to be hurting normal people. But if the altnerative is homelessness or starving I can't really tell you not to.
That said, I think they've stepped up security a great deal in the last decade.
There's definitely time-cost for normal people of dealing with the CC company's fraud department, plus potential monetary costs incurred by having the card temporarily unavailable. Fortunately the actual amounts charged are reimbursed by default, even on debit cards afaik
The security part is interesting. I'm spoilering my rambling because you did not ask in the slightest, and I just like talking about it
I've heard that stores are the main place where security has been stepped up, since they generally lose out when people buy fenceable goods from them and then the fraudulent payments are pulled by the CC companies. Oddly, the chips in cards haven't done a single thing for security in the US unless things have changed since I was browsing a carding forum out of fascination (not coded language here, I just had a lot of time and a slight fixation).Tmk the cards with chips enable a flag that tells a swipe-reader "use the chip instead if a chip reader is present, otherwise swiping is okay" but this is up to the reader device to honor or not. The feature exists but is not implemented in the US to enforce chip-reading at the network level, tagging the card number itself as affiliated with a chip card and disallowing swipe-reading. Since it isn't implemented, counterfeit cards can simply flag themselves as swipe-only even if their credentials are pulled from a chip card - ~~not that chip cards are all that much more expensive to counterfeit these days anyway~~ e: nevermind about that
Good info.
is this a region/carrier specific thing re: chips? here in aus it seems to be a fallback in case the strip/reader fails, but NFC transactions require neither for purchases under $100. No I don't know the security particulars of each
Yeah the implementations vary by region and carrier, but that sounds similar to how it works in the US. I got curious and decided to look it up, and it seems like I may have been wrong about EMV chip cards (which includes NFC-capable cards) being easy to counterfeit because I'd gotten them mixed up with RFID cards.
According to wikipedia the main enforcement method is Liability Shifting, where the CC companies shift the liability to the owner of the point of sale if the point of sale is not EMV-compliant. The Implementation section of the EMV Wikipedia page is relatively readable considering the content, but it describes a real hodge-podge
'liability shift' lmao fuck I love corpospeak