this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
427 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2855 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You should already hate faith. Faith is what the religious use to justify doing nothing themselves.

Hell, faith is the reason half of them are sitting around hoping for Armageddon...

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

faith is what i have in my wifes love for me. i dont want to hate faith, just its abuse.

[–] 8bitguy@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I view it as confidence.

[–] WordenPond@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

@originalucifer faith is conviction in the absence of knowledge and that is down right scary.

@jeffw @MotoAsh

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I desperately hope there is sound, logical evidence for your wife's love.

There is nothing but sophistry and basic philosophy to back religious faith. Religious faith ultimately only comes from peoples' need for meaning. A basic desire can pull people in all sorts of silly directions if all they do is try and sate it.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Capital-F Faith is directly contrary to science and reason. It's believing things to be true without question or proof.

You can be spiritual and also be a logical person who listens to reason and science. But when you devote your entire worldview to Faith, then you should absolutely NOT be in a position to make decisions that affect other people's lives.

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Capital-F Faith is directly contrary to science and reason. It's believing things to be true without question or proof.

It's worse than that. It's believing things despite contrary evidence. It's why you can never win any "debate" with believers. They literally believe that you telling them they're wrong proves that they are right.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

My faith is in the fact that the world is created anew with the appearance of age every Thursday. We don't notice because we are created with memories of an entire history. But we are fooled, and each week the world gets stranger and stranger.

If I were to govern under this faith, I wouldn't bother planning anything longer than a week. I'm sure they wouldn't respect my freedom of religion, then.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I’m religious (syncretic neopaganism), but seeing as I live in the real fucking world where there’s plenty I don’t know I have to assume that part of what I don’t know is the nature of divinity. And I’m certainly not so damn confident in my religion to force people to it. I’m only that confident in the scientific method as a means of seeking truth.

In evidence we trust.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The Bible itself defines faith as: "Faith is the assured expectation of what is hoped for, the evident demonstration of realities that are not seen."

And "demonstration" can also be translated as "convincing evidence".

So faith would be something like having a friend who is a good mechanic that likes helping people, and him telling you that if you ever need help on your car he's offering to help.

You have faith that he is able to see his offer through and fix your car, even though you've never seen him work on any car before.

I think most people today would call that trust, and the word faith has become synonymous with "blind faith", which is what you described with

It's believing things to be true without question or proof.

I'm not trying to say you're wrong or anything, as languages do change over time. But I think it's fair to recognize those differences in definitions.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Faith is just trust. To do anything at all involves some element of faith. To have no faith would turn a person into a deranged control freak. The problem is not faith but religious organizations who try to warp "have faith" into "don't ever use your own intelligence to second guess what we say."

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, faith is more than trust. Faith is trust that you do not verify. Why? Because every time people say they "have faith", it is distinctly about something they cannot or will not verify. 99.99% of the time, it's "will not".