204

Israel raids Gaza's Al Shifa Hospital, urges Hamas to surrender (www.reuters.com)

submitted 11 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] alwaysfallingupyup@lemmings.world 15 points 11 months ago

theres offices and tunnels under a lot of the hospitals. either people arent paying attention or their purposely ignoring facts

[+] snek@lemmy.world -7 points 11 months ago

either people arent paying attention or their purposely ignoring facts

The third option is that Israel is lying.

[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

nuh, there's an underground network under the hospital and it has been previously used as hamas intelligence.

proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof,

[-] snek@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

First link is from X, just Israeli soldiers delivering 300 liters of fuel that won't run the hospital for more than an hour, a troll move.

Second "proof" is an article from 2014. No one ever denied there being tunnels, that would be fucking stupid.

The third one is also from 2014 and behind a paywall.

The fourth one is a link to a google book but I can't read any pages.

And now I'm not even bothering to click the rest.

Has it ever occurred to you that it's not enough to just post hyperlinks and say they are "proof"? Do you understand that it should also entail containing a "proof"? Evidence is not just providing a link or video, it has to actually show something tangible. Israel has failed at that miserably again and again.

[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

First link is from X, just Israeli soldiers delivering 300 liters of fuel that won’t run the hospital for more than an hour, a troll move.

It can power different machines, not the whole hospital at once. Fuel is low for starters to see how effective providing aid will be. Moreso focus on that hamas is hindering their efforts.

Second “proof” is an article from 2014. No one ever denied there being tunnels, that would be fucking stupid.

Yes, they've known about Hamas having control of the hospital since 2014.

The third one is also from 2014 and behind a paywall.

Use a paywall bypass?

The fourth one is a link to a google book but I can’t read any pages.

In google books you can preview pages by searching for specific words. Here you go!

Has it ever occurred to you that it’s not enough to just post hyperlinks and say they are “proof”? Do you understand that it should also entail containing a “proof”? Evidence is not just providing a link or video, it has to actually show something tangible. Israel has failed at that miserably again and again.

bruh you just said you're not bothering to look at the rest eheheh. besides~ the EU, UN, Amnesty International all confirm that Hamas are using hospitals as shields.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

I'm not bothering to look at your like 8 links because the first 4 were bullshit and humans only live for so long, would rather make time for a nice cup of coffee instead.

Screaming "proof, proof, proof" isn't proof, sorry.

The 300 liters of fuel were shameful and offensive, the IDF should be ashamed. Israeli is the reason these babies are dying, and 300 liters were not enough. On top of that the IDF published a recording with someone at the hospital stating that they "didn't want to accept the fuel"... but of course when you speak fucking Arabic, you can hear clearly that it says, "this amount [of fuel] is not okay", since the IDF promised 2k then delivered 0.3k.... even though Israel is the reason they don't have fuel and are dying. Pathetic "evidence", a recording of a few seconds because the rest of the call would have made it clear what the topic was about.

Israel doesn't have convincing evidence, period.

[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I’m not bothering to read your comment because humans only live for so long, would rather make time for a nice cup of coffee instead.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Good, I hope you enjoy your coffee. The more time you spend on coffee is less time you spend on the internet defending a genocidal apartheid project.

[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

im pro-information

do not care what imaginary sky-god is weal

[-] snek@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Who the fuck mentioned God?

[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

what do you think this whole conflict boils down to? their book says they own it. their book says they own it.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023

204 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38977 readers

2090 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.