this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
55 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Intelligence_Gap@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m confused, I thought the junta was pro-China and the rebels weren’t pro-China?

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

i suspect that two things are going on here: China may either be playing both sides/otherwise have shifting allegiances depending on the situation, and the rebel groups are heterogeneous in terms of who they look to for support (since there are like 50 different ethnic rebel groups fighting the government right now). it's a very multifaceted situation in general.

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

No, that's not the situation at all. Policy-wise the Aung San Suu Kyi (partial democracy) government was always much closer to China than the Tatmadaw (military junta). It's well known that Beijing doesn't much like the Tatmadaw..

China's official policy is non-intervention and to support whoever is in stable power i.e the Tatmadaw. But they sell arms to both the junta and to certain of the ethnic armies along the border.

In recent months, many of the ethnic armies have been united into alliances with the pro-democracy army (this is unusual in scope). One of their strategies is to take over sections of the borders with China and India.

I've seen it hypothesised that this strategy is designed to convince China that the Tatmadaw can not deliver stability, which might weaken China's support of the Tatmadaw.

Tagging @alyaza