this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
401 points (97.0% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But they're not banned, religious clothing is

[โ€“] branchial@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

These bans are making someone choose between their religious convictions and employment.

[โ€“] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Give me all your money or I kill you. It's not a ban on your finances, coercion, extortion or whatever bad words exist. You can just choose not to live. It's a choice, your choice : )

[โ€“] branchial@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Its not a real choice. It is meant to reduce the number of people of certain religious affiliations from public workplaces aka ban them.

Consider if the "choice" given women was between presenting male and giving up their jobs. Or not to be considered for a job. It would in effect ban women because they would either have to give up their gender identity at least for the duration of the work or not work there.

Likewise here it would be allowed to make the denunciation of ones religious convictions a job requirement. It's atrocious.