Fuck Cars

9664 readers

63 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

[meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
[article] for news articles
[blog] for any blog-style content
[video] for video resources
[academic] for academic studies and sources
[discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
[meme] for memes
[image] for any non-meme images
[misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

!yimby@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ConfidentLonely@lemmy.world

Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world

toaster@slrpnk.net

570

City roads should be ‘ripped out completely’ to fight pollution, says government adviser (www.telegraph.co.uk)

submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

218 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You know, for someone who complains about other people making strawman of them, you sure do seem fond of it yourself.

Someone: "We should reduce our dependency on cars and shift our infrastructure planning toward other modes of transport wherever possible."

You: "SO YOU WANT TO TEAR OUT ALL ROADS EVERYWHERE AND EXECUTE PEOPLE FOR OWNING CARS?!?1!?!1?"

[+] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"We should reduce our dependency on cars and shift our infrastructure planning toward other modes of transport wherever possible."

This is not what the article says.

SO YOU WANT TO TEAR OUT ALL ROADS EVERYWHERE

This is closer to what the article says.

A government adviser has called for roads in cities to be “ripped out completely” to combat air pollution.

This is the first paragraph of the article.

[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

...and then you actually read the article past the misleading click bait, right? The Telegraph is a conservative paper, they have an interest in smearing anyone who challenges the status quo.

Up to 80 per cent of people living on arterial routes in urban areas did not own cars, with most of the pollution being caused by motorists driving into and through their communities.

Pointing to the “greening” of city centres such as Seoul and Utrecht, he said: “We should start changing our cities and actually start thinking about ripping out road infrastructure and turning them into green spaces or green transport corridors. We have to look beyond traffic.”

That is not something a reasonable person would interpret as ripping out 100% of roads. Especially since he references real projects like Seoul.