this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
150 points (99.3% liked)

Antiwork

8264 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] petriborg@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because of their contractor status they may not have any grounds to do so. Looks real shitty though for sure.

[–] aloeha@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's fucked up. Hopefully we can change that law some day.

[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Contractors make all these issues muddy and provide easy loopholes.

Generally a company will sign on a contractor with specific requirements. If the contracting company can no longer financially meet them, such as due to unionization, the contract is cancelled.

The rub is probably that the contract terms are not achievable while being fair to the end-of-the-line workers. I’m not sure how to fix this.

I’ve accidentally caused this myself. I put out a publicly funded contract with stiff terms to ‘keep the contractors honest.’ What that ended up meaning is that the contractor became a horrible place to work since they cut corners, and the company still makes their money. That contract was eventually canceled due to documented violations, so then all their employees were just plain unemployed.