435
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, back in reality, my company isn't upside down on commercial real estate & likes making more money so we are getting a smaller office to house our servers & equipment.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 1 year ago

My company did the same. We had a six week assessment period where everyone was required to come in two days per week. Once that data showed no major difference in output, we got a smaller office (for receiving and such) and everyone was told the office is optional. Smart business that kept people happy.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago

This right here.

Find me a company deeply invested in office real estate (in particular, expecting a return on that real estate), and I'll show you a company against remote work.

The real detriments don't exist. True, I have met workers that don't like remote work: companies have latched on to those people as an excuse to continue what is otherwise an entirely transparent narrative.

If anything I gain productivity by working from home. I see companies that don't support that kind of work as entirely being behind the curve.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Mine was a bit hesitant but they are now talking seriously about getting rid of more offices and they had done one pass on that before. I would sorta like them to have an office subscription

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
435 points (98.0% liked)

Work Reform

9828 readers
1428 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS