this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
309 points (85.2% liked)

memes

10309 readers
1842 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently this reminder is needed.

It is a meme.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact, the word 'set' has 430 definitions.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's quite a set of definitions

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If the set of definitions contains the word set, does the English language implode in a recursive cascade of paradoxes?

[–] bort@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A set can totally contain itself. A better question would be: Consider a set, that contains all sets, that do not contain themself. Would that set contain itself?

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

It would. Source: I just shaved my beard

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, just relax the axiom of comprehension, allow U ∈ U and move on with proving things for fun and profit. No one said that you have to pick axioms that seem natural or intuitive.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Define "the" without using the word "the"... Take that logic! Set and match!

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

A common English definite article