868
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A former Mississippi political candidate is facing criminal charges after a bedazzled statue of Baphomet, a figure associated with the Satanic Temple, was discovered decapitated at the Iowa State Capitol.

Michael Cassidy, 35, a former U.S. Navy pilot, told Fox News that he saw the controversy surrounding the display, which was heavily criticized by Republican politicians like Ron DeSantis, and drove to the Iowa Capitol to see it for himself. He said it hit a “nerve” and went on to destroy it.

According to an archived version of his campaign website, Cassidy pushed for a 10-year prison sentence for anyone who destroys a statue in his own state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 94 points 9 months ago

Cassidy was arrested and faces vandalism charges, which could carry a one-year prison sentence and a $2,560 fine. He has since been released

Why is he not being charged under Iowa's hate crime laws?

[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

I would like to see this, although I wonder if the correct answer is that religion is not a protected group. If religion is a protected group, this is a hate crime.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Come now, we both know Christians would just then cry that non-belief isn't a religion.

In fact, I'm pretty sure I remember hearing that come up in the past... They're using motivated reasoning. They want a specific outcome, not a set of principles applied.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago

Sucks for them. They apparently haven't heard of Title VII of the Civil rights act.

"Religious beliefs include theistic beliefs (i.e. those that include a belief in God) as well as non-theistic “moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.”

"Religious observances or practices include, for example, attending worship services, praying, wearing religious garb or symbols, displaying religious objects, adhering to certain dietary rules, proselytizing or other forms of religious expression, or refraining from certain activities."

Those quotes are from the US customs and border protection website here. Straight from the horses mouth.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It does suck for them, but that's never stopped them from trying and they even get unconstitutional laws on the books.

The mere fact something is illegal does not stop someone.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Oh for sure, it is scary how they can do mental gymnastics like that. All it really takes is a corrupt judge that follows the Bible more than they follow our laws and constitution to be able to sidestep that, too. Thankfully, most judges do make their decisions based on our laws and constitution.

[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I understand though what we need to realize is that this isn’t simply “non-belief”. Satanic temple members have strongly held beliefs as part of the core tenants of satanism. It’s a non-superstitious religion. It’s just as valid a religion as christianity or islam.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I agree with you, I'm just pointing out that the Christians are not using logic or reasoning despite using words that might convince you otherwise.

[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I can’t argue with that.

[-] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

But it isn’t a non-belief. I wholeheartedly believe they’re wrong.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Hopefully no one will have to tell that to a judge. Religous extremists are a poison.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I don't know the right answer. Religious persecution is a real thing and has caused the deaths of countless people across the years that humans have existed. BUT Christians aren't being persecuted in America (at the moment at least) and have an undo influence on the levers of power. I feel like a good thing to do would be to give the IRS teeth and and have individual Churches or Church organizations that violate the terms of their non profit status actually lose it and have to pay taxes on the huge amount of wealth they own (mostly land but I am sure other shit).

[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Yes, all churches need to pay taxes.

Nuh uh! Churches do charity work so they need to be tax free. — any christian we’ve argued with over this on the internet.

See, the thing about charity work is, it’s tax deductible!

[-] Caradoc879@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Because Iowa is still under a Christian stranglehold behind the scenes.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Iowa used to be purple, it's since turned into a red shithole. You got a few bright spots in Des Moines and Iowa city, but the rest of the state is rednecks and meth heads.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 9 months ago

but the rest of the state is rednecks and meth heads.

feels true about every state these days...

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

That's 'cause it is. There is no such thing as "red states" and "blue states;" there are only states that are a slightly higher percentage rural or slightly higher percentage urban.

[-] Frigid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Haven't looked it up, but I'd be shocked if there is a single state where rural outnumbered urban.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I didn't mean to suggest "outnumbered;" I meant to say that the urban/rural percentages are slightly different between states and that that's what makes the difference in ideology.

More concretely, it isn't that Southerners are worse than anybody else; it's that rural folks everywhere are equally terrible. Urban southerners are just as cosmopolitan as northern ones and rural folks from (for example) Oregon are just as backwards and racist as rural folks from Georgia. The only thing that makes Oregon a "blue state" and Georgia a "red state" is that metropolitan Portland etc. make up a slightly higher percentage of Oregon's total population than metropolitan Atlanta etc. make up of Georgia's.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Off the top of my head, I bet Montana fits the bill. Maybe one or both of the Dakotas too

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Yep. Otherwise who’s to say a random cross somewhere doesn’t ‘strike a nerve’ precedent of him getting away w it just leads to chaos.

[-] deadtom@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

"I saw the cross and it struck a nerve. When I think of those men in those dresses molesting children... I saw red, white, and blue... and I knew I needed to stand up for those children's freedom from this den of paedophiles"

This is the news story I'm waiting for. If only the people larping as protectors of children knew the call was coming from inside their own house of worship.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There’s at least some who know and don’t really care. They’re just there to feel accepted and popular.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Because those laws only exist to protect christians?

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
868 points (97.9% liked)

News

22900 readers
4175 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS