this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
958 points (91.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35826 readers
894 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google search failed to even find a hollywood movie, even after 1 hour of attempts. I don't really care about the movie, but I am terrified by the prospect that google now ceased to function on this basic level. Why is this happening?

I understand the explanations of seo and other stuff like spam content. But why are there NO relevant results at all.

I wouldn't mind having to start wading through results at page 2 or even 10 but now it utterly fails to find even the most basic things.

Things you found on the first attempt even just a year ago. Now they are effectively hidden.

To me functionally the entire internet has now vanished. I cannot access anything that I am searching for. Might as well not exist at all.

Has anybody found a way around this?

Is this on purpose? Is this an attack on the free internet, herding people to just the top 5 sites like facebook, youtube, tiktok, and so forth?

Are there search engines that still work?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 75 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I've finally switched to DuckDuckGo because of this. Even though only about two months ago I said here somewhere that it's garbage. Google just managed to convince me that they're more garbage.

[–] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's because DDG gets its results from Bing.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

But without the chatgpt spam that has overtaken bing the last few months.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I came to the exact same decision a few months ago.

DDG used to be worse; now it’s better.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The only downside of DDG is that it doesn't have a decade or two of algorithm data to personalise your searches and sort of "learn" what you mean with certain terms.

Not like I miss it too much. It's just a mild culture shock to suddenly having to be more clear with my searches

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 16 points 10 months ago

That's a good thing, in my opinion. I miss when Google results were the same for everyone.

[–] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It just occurred to me that this ability to communicate with a search engine, that everyone used to call Google-fu, was exactly this! It didn't already know (or think it knew) what you were getting at, and it's took some practice to figure out how to finesse the results.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

You mean the upside is it doesn't track every behavioral trait? I can live with that

[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've been using Bing and choosing Google only as a second resort or for any shopping I do. If Google wants to be an ad filled shopping mall, I'll treat it as an ad-blocked shopping mall.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In that case you should be using DuckDuckGo; it uses the same database as Bing, without the tracking of Bing, and with the ability to use ! commands to pull in results from other places (!g=Google, !w=Wikipedia, etc.).

[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

When I'm specifically shopping for things I expect to be tracked and advertised to. I'm just selectively deciding who gets to advertise to me.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Over the last year of me using DDG as my primary search engine it has noticeably improved, give it another and we might see a trace of that spark Google had

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

I find my DDG results are only getting worse with time.
Same problem as with Google, and then some.
Carefully craft search string and submit.
Click through to a result, scroll and try to find the part that addresses my question.
Get frustrated and Ctrl+F for the active part of my search string.
Don't find it.
Hit back to search results to repeat (but now the results are shuffled for some reason?)
Eventually give up and put the active parts into quotes to force their inclusion.
Same results.

Why am I getting these results if they don't even match my search string?

[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

been using duckduckgo for a while now. it definetely could be better, but google is just hot garbage.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Ddg is my default, but I still find myself having to resort to Google when the query is not dead simple. The engine is good enough for most cases, but overall Google is just better imo.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

DDG is way worse than google. I am baffled by this comment.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

It may be bing under the hood, but it gives simple results without having ads and giant boxes everywhere.