291
submitted 8 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aleq@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

4 000 000 a missile, 100 000x times more expensive than a military drone? what military drone costs $40?

I don't know what models are in use today, but a Bayraktar TB2 costs 4 million.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The Ukrainians and houthis are having successful attacks with consumer drones that have hand grenades or ieds taped to them. You don’t need a “military grade” drone to fly an explosive where it shouldn’t be

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You aren’t going to take out an arms warehouse, a bridge, or anything of tactical meaningfulness with a grenade drone.

They are good for taking out soft targets but that’s about it. Their use is extremely limited as grenades are only good as anti-personnel weapons.

Comparing them to Patriot missiles is silly. Different uses.

They wouldn’t use Patriot missiles on targets where grenades are effective.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

A block of c4 is as easily taped to a drone as a grenade and that will take out the targets you mentioned.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

A block of C4 would put maybe dents in the type of targets that Patriot missiles are designed for.

You also need to be within vicinity of your target to be able to operate a drone, which a missile doesn’t need.

Drones can be easily jammed. Missiles aren’t easily jammed, not with the same tech stack needed for drone jamming.

Apples and oranges. Different targets, different engagements, different applications entirely.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I’m not saying they replace Patriot missiles, obviously that’s not the case. I’m just saying you can cause a lot of damage with a $100 dollar drone and some c4, pretty similar damage to a $400,000 missile. The missiles aren’t really showing their cost-impact ratios to be good if what the Russians are spending on Ukraine is to be taken as evidence

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Don't forget scouting. Giving soldiers in the field the ability to poke one over a hill can be useful. A $25 FPV drone off Amazon can do that job if that's all you can afford.

Not that you'd use a Patriot against that, either.

[-] Cinner@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

soft targets

now that's a multiple meaning I can get behind. soft, pudgy, vodka filled targets.

[-] nekandro@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

Both Russia and Ukraine are heavily reliant on consumer drones from the likes of DJI. Those run in the 1000-4000 dollar range.

this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
291 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2729 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS