660

Sorry, can't find any better sources for this.

The animator then asked Maher what the “downside” of “getting a vaccine” was, which caused the comedian to go on an anti-vax tirade.

“The fact that you the fact that you don’t even have a clue what’s the cost of getting a vaccine that you don’t know the answer to that. You completely want to shut your eyes to the fact that there are repercussions to all medical interventions, including a vaccine, all vaccines,” he ranted. “They come, they say side effects, just like every medication does. You can see it in the literature. They can’t write it on their back on the vaccine. So you have to dig them. And of course, there is a vaccine court because so many people have been injured.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah I dunno how he can look at this and think it's good to release it. He's basically rich and set for life at this point so maybe it's a "because I can" thing.

Jeff saying he doesn't own a gun and Maher just berating him and telling him what the only reasonable opinion is comes off as completely insane.

[-] rezz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There is 0 chance he reviewed this edit. Thats the only reason this is probably out. He’s doing volume and trusting his people—and this is also probably the “best” cut (which tells you how bad it really is in real-time)—because as bad as he is, there’s just no way he knowingly released a cut like that with an actual peer like Jeff Ross.

Now that it’s been seen, he will obviously defend it because it’s weak to pull it. But Bill isn’t so out of touch that he’d proactively release material that makes him look like Ross is embarrassed to be there.

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah that's true and I doubt it costs him much for the production, he's probably just wanting to have a podcast because he enjoys some podcasts and knows they're cool right now. He probably wouldn't even respond to criticism of it beyond, "well you know what if you don't like it don't watch it okaaay, and maybe when you grow up you can enjoy hearing how adults talk and have fun."

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Eh, it happens fairly frequently that people are in a weird bubble and are so convinced they're right they'll willingly put out an insane rant thinking that once everyone sees it they'll change how they think.

Maher is a Hollywood guy which means he's in a big bubble to begin with. And then he's probably got an entourage that tells him he's right about everything. They audience at his shows are a self selected group of people that agree with him.

Sure it's possible his team released it because they don't give a shit about him looking bad because he's an asshole. But it's equally likely he ok'ed it simply because he thinks he's right and no one he's surrounded by day to day tells him otherwise.

this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
660 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4771 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS