this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
610 points (98.0% liked)

News

23284 readers
3630 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pregnant people in New York would have 40 hours of paid leave to attend prenatal medical appointments under a new proposal by Gov. Kathy Hochul after the state’s legislative session kicked off this week.

The Democrat’s plan to expand the state’s paid family leave policy, which would need to be approved by the state Legislature, aims to expand access to high-quality prenatal care and prevent maternal and infant deaths in New York, an issue that especially affects low-income and minority communities.

The U.S. infant mortality rate, a measure of how many babies die before they reach their first birthday, is worse than other high-income countries, which experts have attributed to poverty, inadequate prenatal care and other possibilities. The U.S. rate rose 3% in 2022 — the largest increase in two decades, according to a 2023 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

We're saying that entire societies benefit from having parents spend early months/years with their young children. Because society as a whole profits from that activity, that activity should be subsidized by the government.

And I promise I'm at least as old as you

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I think it's fine raising taxes on the wealthy so working folks can stay at home with their families.

My issue is that requiring employers to do that means that it's impossible to start a business if you don't already have a lot of excess capital and an established customer base.

Can Google do it? Absolutely.

Can an average food truck do it? Absolutely not.

[–] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If your employer can't afford to give new parents leave, then one way or another you are being exploited for somebody else's profit.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

What exactly is your point? That every business who can't afford to pay employees who aren't working shouldn't get to operate? Just go ahead and say it, unless you're afraid it's a stupid idea and you're purposefully avoiding admitting it for this reason.

That's how you're literally only left with big name companies like Google and Amazon.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

impossible to start a business if you don’t already have a lot of excess capital and an established customer base.

If your business cannot support the basic operating costs of the humans it employs, it has no value to society. It's a parasite that feeds off the welfare spending of the state to enrich it's owner.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

True, but businesses have proven that humans don't need months off with pay for having children.

[–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The solution of course is having a payroll type tax that funds parental leave. Everyone pays in, and the government pays out so companies, large and small, don't have to deal with the issue you're talking about. I'd like my employer to have zero say in things like this, unless they want to go above and beyond. Same for healthcare. Let companies be companies, and let's use taxes to find societal needs

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Pretty much every regulation like this has a minimum busi ness size it applies to, for exactly this reason

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If the government is paying for it I am all in.

Having businesses pay for it will just result in less women getting good jobs.

Alternatively we can go for mandated parental leave for both parents (not at the same time), which evens out the playing field between genders, men get to spend more time with their infants, and hiring women has no inherent disadvantage for businesses. There are countries in europe going for that - every other solution i can think of leads to a disadvantage for women.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago