this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
464 points (84.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
448 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Meat, fish from overfished oceans, plantations from pesticides and deforestation.

Guess ill starve

[–] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For anyone unaware, deforestation is driven by animal agriculture. In fact, most of the crops grown are for animal feed. It’s inefficient, and the more efficient we make it, the crueler it is for the animals.

Eating plants will definitely do the least harm.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Sucks, but that will provide decades of benefits for the rest of us

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, we're all gonna starve. The rich are making sure of it. It'd really only take one of the super rich to choose to do good instead of evil and literally save the whole world, but humans, evidently, just don't make good people.

[–] mob@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm just just curious, what do you think Elon Musk(or whoever is the richest person in the world at this point) could do to save the whole world?

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Socialism but with more steps, more then likely.

[–] mob@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

And itd still be a drop in the bucket compared to government spending.

Also,not everything can be solved by throwing money at it

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Isn't it impossible for a Capitalist to individually transition to Socialism, no matter how powerful, unless they had an economic monopoly? They could transition their own businesses to worker self-management and ownership, but that's it.