this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1752 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39151 readers
2201 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm fine with AI content. It's going to make making media so much easier for people who aren't inherently artistic but have a vision they want to show.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There are already teams of humans ready to do all that stuff. AI adds nothing there. The non-artistic person with a vision can already collaborate with skilled artists.

But more importantly, we are not worried about artists using AI as a tool. We are worried about corporate goons using AI to fire all creative staff and generate manipulative trash.

[–] kale@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

The first company that debuts an entirely AI film will be a game changer, since it's training set will be all the greats/popular films from Godfather, Taxi Driver, Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Inglorious Bastards, and Parasite.

Then everyone will want to get in on the game and we'll see a huge number of AI films. To be noticable and unique, a certain amount of hallucinating will be allowed. After a couple more years, you'll see model collapse as the film AIs are now using other AI output as their training input.

AI systems need a steady "diet" of human created material to continue to create material that is relevant and interesting to humans.

Robert Evans has a great episode on "behind the bastards" about AI and children's books. The majority of Kindle published children's books and coloring books are AI generated. There are Kindle books on how to make hundreds of AI children's books a month using AI tools, including how to write the prompt for the AI input.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Okay so instead of me just working on a fun product for free in my own time, I have to pay someone a fair wage as if this is a commercial product I'm producing?

There's several people in this thread arguing we should outright ban the use, instead of coming up with ways to protect artists without artificially limiting AI.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have to pay someone a fair wage as if this is a commercial product I'm producing?

There's several people in this thread arguing we should outright ban the use,

I didn't see anyone ITT making that argument, and anyway this whole debate is specifically and explicitly about hollywood goons using AI to churn out trash without paying the talent. It's not about some broke artist using AI to bring his vision to life. As I already said. It's beyond straw man to treat that as the position that's being criticized

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop being lazy and learn how to make your own shit. You aren't entitled to other people's skills.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He says on a computer instead of hiring a postal worker to deliver his message.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

In my own words instead of having ChatGPT do your thinking for you, the way you do