this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
145 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2395 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the greatest rebuke yet to Pope Francis, the Catholic bishops of Africa and Madagascar issued a unified statement Thursday refusing to follow his declaration allowing priests to offer blessings to same-sex couples and asserting that such unions are “contrary to the will of God.”

The statement, signed by Congolese Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo on behalf of the symposium of African national bishops conferences, marked the closest thing to a continent-wide dissent from the declaration Francis approved Dec. 18 allowing priests to offer such blessings.

That declaration from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has sent shock waves through the Catholic Church, thrilling LGBTQ+ Catholics as a concrete sign of Francis’ message of welcome but alarming conservatives who fear core doctrines of the church are being ignored or violated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (3 children)

When popes and antipopes collide, the popes destroy each other, with a huge energy release. Depending on the colliding popes, not only is there a great energy release, but new, different popes may also be produced (such as neutrinopes and various flavours of quarkpopes – see figure below). These new popes will have a lower mass than those in the original collision, due to the law of conservation of ecclesiastical energy and Einstein’s very famous equation E=mc2 – some of the energy goes into heat and light, some into forming the new popes.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What happens to the pope hats, are they conserved

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yes, conservation of funny hats is pretty much a universal phenomenon

[–] teft@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

We actually can't tell if the funny hats are conserved. We call this the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

This guy Heisenberg came up with it:

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In my experience funny hats can be created out of non-funny hats pretty easily. I don't think that conservation law holds.

[–] twack@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

That is because all non-funny hats are also funny hats at the same time. It is only at the moment of observation that a hat decides whether it is funny or not funny.

We refer to this phenomenon as Schrödinger's hat.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah but the total funniness of the hats is still conserved; you may be creating a funny hat from non-funny hats, but the total funniness is the same as the sum of the earlier hats.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 2 points 10 months ago

neutrinopes

Pope number is conserved confirmed.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago

I think you forgot to post the figure you referred to.