this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
280 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you read the article, it's nothing to do specifically with EVs, they just had an unusually high crash rate.

[–] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“Likelihood of crashing” is part of the cost of ownership (regardless of engine type). For example, suppose a particular model comes with certain features that are more likely to distract the driver, thus increasing the rate of highway collisions, thus either increasing the cost of repairs over the life of the vehicle or just shortening the life of the vehicle—all else equal, this vehicle has a higher cost of ownership than a different model with fewer distractions, collisions, repairs, etc.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“Likelihood of crashing” is part of the cost of ownership

Uh, no, it's definitely not.

[–] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

We’ll have to agree to disagree.