I’ll admit though, I pay for YouTube and get more bang for the buck than any other money I spend on entertainment. I’ve had it for a while though, and did not sign up because of their renewed war on ad blocking. Plus it’s nice that the creators get paid from my view, even though it’s not much.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Direct revenue is logically a better model for creators, but I don't like that the share of youtube premium revenue is determined by a black box. If it's distributed according to my total monthly watch time, how can anyone say for sure whether the direct revenue split for a given channel >= potential advertising revenue had I watched without premium or adblock? I don't think even creators could tell you based on the analytics available to them via Youtube.

I canceled and set up memberships on a few channels instead. That way I actually get something out of it (member perks), and I know that at least my favourite creators get 70% of those amounts. Also, sponsorblock

[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I pay for YouTube as well, it's worth it bc of YouTube music which I like better than Spotify, I just need podcasts to get on board and we will be good to go. I will add YouTube is the only media I pay for (other than peacock for 1 month a year to watch tour de France)

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Firefox with ublock origin plus autoplay while you're in a music playlist says what?

Seriously firefox mobile can play stuff in the background. If you didn't know

[–] citrusface@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I've not had good luck with Firefox on mobile, I use duckduckgo. I'm not forcing anyone to do what I do. YouTube is my main source of media for the most part. I use it on my smarts TV's in my house - and I haven't set up computers on all TV's yet... So it is what it is and it works for me.

Edit: down voting my personal opinion and what I choose to spend my money on for my own convenience isn't going to change my mind... Just saying

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

That’s one of the big values for me, the effortless smart device support. Sure I know tech shit and I block ads in every browser I use, but it’s nice when members of my family can just use the YouTube app, full featured, on whatever TV/phone/tablet they have access to at the moment. It’s not a matter of whether I can watch YouTube for free without seeing ads, it’s a question of whether the convenience and creator support are worth the cost of a drive thru meal per month. Add in YouTube music and I don’t even think about it any more.

It’s an ease of use thing, kind of like how Steam ended PC game piracy for many people.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh I think I know what you mean. DDG + Firefox has some weird behavior on YouTube. I can watch the videos but if I wanna properly load the page it gives me a request failure.

It's kind of frustrating on mobile. Have you tried loading through a different search engine? It's not a big issue for me but it's something I experience too as I'm a DDG user