this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
546 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But there may be more, and it’s possible that Google is attempting to spread out the bad news instead of having it hit all at once.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 38 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Another drop of blood in the water. tech is no longer a boom industry. The hopes of infinite growth have been dashed on the reality that there is a fixed amount of time people can spend on phones, computers and tablets in a day. Meanwhile the anxious suits are saying “but is there anyway we could get people to not sleep? That’s be an additional 8 hours we could be showing them adds and harvesting their data.”

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

"Google parent firm Alphabet employed 182,381 employees as of September 30th, 2023, so roughly a thousand job cuts would only be around half a percent of the company’s total."

This is just a normal optimization, and holy fuck are they huge.

During the pandemic everyone was over-hiring, it doesn't exactly tell you what you've wrote, but you are right as a whole.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think this is likely the first in a lot more cuts to come. Google probably does not want to do it all at once though, potentially because that would be a huge red flag for the whole industry and hurt the confidence of investors in the industry as a whole.

Given that Google makes most of their money by selling services to other parts of the industry, and a lot of the industry runs solely on the confidence of investors, doing a bunch of big cuts all at once would harm them. But they do need to cut back a lot more long term, because investor money is drying up to feed the companies that buy services from Google.

[–] averagedrunk@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yep. A lot of these tech companies that have run in the red for years are now being called on to produce a profit and pay the big backers.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 9 points 10 months ago

The funny thing is, that most of the one who do make a profit, do so by selling goods and services to those not making a profit, and if all the unprofitable ones disappeared the “profitable” ones would suddenly be unprofitable as well.

[–] ptsdstillinmymind@lemmy.studio 12 points 10 months ago

Infinite growth is part of the reason Capitalism sucks. There is no way any company can grow infinitely.

[–] Thalestr@beehaw.org 8 points 10 months ago

Which is exactly why they want people wearing smartwatches to sleep.

[–] Titan@beehaw.org 6 points 10 months ago

The boom bust cycles in this industry have extremely high rates. There'll be another boom in like 3 years

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

As soon as it becomes possible to make people dream about specific ads in exchange for money, it will take off in any poorer countries....

I hate ads.