34
submitted 9 months ago by blakeus12@hexbear.net to c/marxism@hexbear.net

I read Capital, and the whole thing just went over my head. I really couldn't understand what he was getting at. Could any comrades help explain the LTV? Thanks! fidel-salute-big

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago

That sounds more like an explanation of 'surplus value' than of the question above.

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, this is like condensed capital v.1-3, but comrade said they've struggled to internalize it. Labor theory of value by itself doesn't have explanatory power, just saying stuff embeds labor, its value and price are vaguely connected into this embedded labor. But also here are 1000 pages how this gets distorted by equalization of profit rates across spheres of production, means of production, competition, finance capital and other factors.

this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

marxism

3657 readers
1 users here now

For the study of Marxism, and all the tendencies that fall beneath it.

Read Lenin.

Resources below are from r/communism101. Post suggestions for better resources and we'll update them.

Study Guides

Explanations

Libraries

Bookstores

Book PDFs

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS