this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
580 points (91.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5856 readers
2902 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Any kind of freedom ends were you are violating the freedom of someone else. Spitting hatred against women and minorities has nothing to do with freedom of speech.

[–] licherally@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

As much as I dislike people spitting hatred at women, LGBTQIA+ folks, and POCs, this is still freedom of speech. You don't have to enjoy it, you don't have to listen to it, and you're certainly free to remove these people from your personally owned spaces. But it doesn't change the fact that people should be allowed to say whatever the fuck they want, otherwise we literally are punishing people for thought crimes and edgy jokes.

People should be judged for their actions, not their words. Words don't actually mean anything without action behind them.

I'm a gay man, and I've definitely given out the occasional f slur pass. Why? Because I honestly think it's funny as fuck when my best friend of 20 years calls me that. He doesn't hate me, he knows and loves my partner like a sibling, and he is my brother. It would be so fucked if he got in some kind of actual trouble for that...

[–] Nahdahar@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

The dangerous thing with speech is the ability to radicalize people. I mostly agree with your comment but it's a more complex topic than "until you don't do something bad you're fine".

[–] mugthol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So if someone says "let's kill all women, gays and jews" that's totally fine for you?

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

I think their point is that you don't throw them in prison just for saying it. If they actually do it or influence others to do it then that's very different. I always try to think how a law could be twisted or abused, and once you make simply saying something illegal that opens the door to a lot of authoritarianism.

[–] licherally@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If they're just saying that, I certainly don't want to be around them but I don't think they should go to prison. If they act upon that, that's entirely different and should be treated as a hate crime.

Also, you just said it. Does context matter to you? What about intention?

[–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

til am allowed to say personal information

[–] licherally@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's fundamentally not the same thing, don't be obtuse for the sake of debate points.

Insults and general demeaning comments should not be punished in the court of law. Saying offensive things should not be punished in the court of law.

As I said before, the action/intent is the part that should be punished. Providing private information about someone who you disagree with or want to incur harm upon is an action with malicious intent.

As a leftist, I fail to understand why we always jump to tone policing and purity politics? We can identify the material conditions that cause radicalization and general bigotry and act upon these things, but we always just jump to punishing people for being radical bigots, which only further galvanizes those positions.

We're not making these spaces smaller, we're making them more volatile by doing this. They see these conversations and think "this is why we have to remove leftism, because they will punish us for crimes we have yet to do" and that's precisely what this argument is.

[–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] licherally@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Well I'm holding you in contempt in court for making a joke that I didn't agree with. I hope you're ready to pay a huge fine, because this is an open and shut case.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why does your freedom of speech cover insulting me? It doesn't make any sense? Instead of me having to remove myself from public spaces to not get insulted, the people insulting in public spaces should be removed????

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Because what is insulting enough to warrant removal is extremely subjective. Pretty much everyone agrees there's a line somewhere, where people draw that line is very different. I would never even consider trying to stop people from making bad edgy jokes, but I will tell them the joke isn't funny and they just seem like a bigot if that's what I think.

I also wouldn't consider 4chan a public place. Someone holding up a sign in a train station that says "gays are an abomination" I would agree should be removed as they are actively making a public space hostile to someone. But then I'd also put different standards on a non-spontaneous demonstration, as those have to be cleared beforehand and won't happen on a super frequent basis, and there needs to be some way to voice any opinion that doesn't outright call for violence.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well you guys do realise though, that outside the US, in a damn big ass amount of countries, insulting people is illegal and not considered freedom of speech?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I am not in the US lol. Insulting people is in fact illegal here, that doesn't mean i necessarily agree with that in a general capacity. There was a famous case of a politician here a few years ago that sued and had someones house raided over them insulting them on twitter (with a very harmless insult too), which is absolutely ridiculous.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Get over it Karen. Fucking baby.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago

Oh wow now you really showed me. I have the right to bear arms so I will arm myself with a nuclear bomb. When anyone steps on my property lawn I will detonate it.

Get a grip troll.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Saying hateful, dumbass shit doesn't violate anyone's freedom. Denying them their right to congregate, get equal service in business, have bodily autonomy, etc. does. However, speech alone is not enough to equate to action, in most cases.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Saying hateful, dumbass shit doesn’t violate anyone’s freedom

That depends entirely on your definition of freedom.

If someone were to punch me, it would violate my freedom from being punched/ bodily harm.
This is illegal in the US.

If someone were to insult me, it would violate my freedom from being insulted (maybe psychological harm).
This is legal in the US but illegal elsewhere.

speech alone is not enough to equate to action

Speech is not something that happens to you, it's something you actively do. It is always an action.