this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
648 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
519 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An official FBI document dated January 2021, obtained by the American association "Property of People" through the Freedom of Information Act.

This document summarizes the possibilities for legal access to data from nine instant messaging services: iMessage, Line, Signal, Telegram, Threema, Viber, WeChat, WhatsApp and Wickr. For each software, different judicial methods are explored, such as subpoena, search warrant, active collection of communications metadata ("Pen Register") or connection data retention law ("18 USC§2703"). Here, in essence, is the information the FBI says it can retrieve:

  • Apple iMessage: basic subscriber data; in the case of an iPhone user, investigators may be able to get their hands on message content if the user uses iCloud to synchronize iMessage messages or to back up data on their phone.

  • Line: account data (image, username, e-mail address, phone number, Line ID, creation date, usage data, etc.); if the user has not activated end-to-end encryption, investigators can retrieve the texts of exchanges over a seven-day period, but not other data (audio, video, images, location).

  • Signal: date and time of account creation and date of last connection.

  • Telegram: IP address and phone number for investigations into confirmed terrorists, otherwise nothing.

  • Threema: cryptographic fingerprint of phone number and e-mail address, push service tokens if used, public key, account creation date, last connection date.

  • Viber: account data and IP address used to create the account; investigators can also access message history (date, time, source, destination).

  • WeChat: basic data such as name, phone number, e-mail and IP address, but only for non-Chinese users.

  • WhatsApp: the targeted person's basic data, address book and contacts who have the targeted person in their address book; it is possible to collect message metadata in real time ("Pen Register"); message content can be retrieved via iCloud backups.

  • Wickr: Date and time of account creation, types of terminal on which the application is installed, date of last connection, number of messages exchanged, external identifiers associated with the account (e-mail addresses, telephone numbers), avatar image, data linked to adding or deleting.

TL;DR Signal is the messaging system that provides the least information to investigators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potsnpans@beehaw.org 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

The really nice part about this is that this is exactly what Signal says they can share, and have been forced to share in the past. It's a tested history of complete policy transparency.

[–] twhite@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah but I'm still mad about their decision to drop SMS/MMS.

Wonderful app, great handling of signal to signal messaging, but it really took away my ability to sell end to encryption to friends and family.

[–] lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

it really took away my ability to sell end to encryption to friends and family

As I understand it, SMS and MMS aren't encrypted (and that's why support was dropped. Unfortunately, you were never selling your friends e2e as long as they kept using SMS, even if they used it through Signal. In fact, it's arguable that the false perception of security in "now I'm texting through Signal, and that means it's secure!" was even more damaging than never having switched in the first place. (Unless they went all the way and stopped using SMS, of course.)

So, nothing is lost from that perspective. Now you can more accurately recommend ppl to use Signal messages instead of SMS and know that you are more accurately selling e2e with every convert because they can't keep using insecure messaging through Signal.

[–] potsnpans@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fair, though personally I'm kindof glad they did. "Signal is a secure messaging app" is a lot easier to explain to non-tech-savvy people than "Signal is a secure messaging app, as long as you are messaging someone who is using Signal too. It can also send regular texts but they can't be encrypted." Leaving that nuance out would have left people texting with a false assumption of security, but I lost several people explaining it because it "sounds complicated".

[–] flynnguy@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but now a lot of people I convinced to use it, no longer use it because they just want to use one app.

[–] ninchuka@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

sms through signal was not encrypted, how would that even work? how would the signal app even know your contacts were using an app that supports encryption?

[–] twhite@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You're correct I should have better worded my point: Signal used to be a single all that someone could install that could handle sending out their regular unencrypted SMS messages and Signal encrypted messages.

Signal also did exactly what you've described - auto-enabled encryption when it detected another signal user by phone number.

The net result was more people using encrypted messaging.

[–] Onihikage@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Signal accounts are based on your phone number, so if you're messaging a number that has an account with Signal, the app could see that and would send the message through Signal's protocols to that Signal account instead of with the SMS protocol which is not encrypted.

[–] Borgzilla@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago