this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
593 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59609 readers
3108 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 179 points 9 months ago (7 children)

It’s a native feature of the device that allows its user to get enormous amounts of attention, in real life and subsequently online, by simply wearing it in public.

Sounds horrible. I guess I’m not someone who seeks attention at any cost like some people, it public is the last situation I’d use this thing in. I would feel like a complete dumbass wearing it at a coffee shop and waving my hands around.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 89 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's the same problem google glass had. It can be the most information rich and user friendly device in the world but if you look like a dingus wearing it, it will never catch on.

[–] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 63 points 9 months ago (4 children)

That's what I thought about the elephant tusk looking AirPods yet here we are.

The Reality Distortion Field sometimes makes things hard to predict when it comes to Apple products.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People on here are wired.

Air pods just look like regular apple headphones just without wires.

They sure as shit look less goofy than my huge pixel buds that stuck an inch out of my ear.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You’re probably thinking of the current gen AirPods rather than the original (comparison).

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Lol. So Gen 2 they were finally like "let's shape this thing more like someone's ear". Then Gen 3 "Fuck it, ears are apparently different shapes let's just go with the tried and true method that's been around on $5 earphones for a decade"

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Only “pros” have human ears. Everyone else must be mutants.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I'm kind of surprised people felt that way about AirPods. I don't remember that at the time. They seem quite mild to me at this point - people didn't mind wearing regular earbuds around, why worry if there's a cord or not?

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

I thought they looked like uncooked long macaroni.

They look like puss leaking out of the ear to me.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What if I already look like a dingus?

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Then if you wear it you'll be an even bigger dingus and make other dinguses look less dingusy. It would kinda be a public service of sorts I guess.

[–] whodatdair@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

The lesser known brother of the Overton window - the Dingerton window.

[–] double_oh_walter@feddit.nu 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Two dingi don’t make a right. Or something.

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dingi.

Pronounced ding eye? Dingii? Ding gee eye?

My brain hurts now.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But thats just a single dinghy.

If you pluralize that its either dinghies or dingii?

Meh, my autistic brain gets stuck on weird stupid shit like this.

Its like... If you have a donut, then a second donut, you have two donuts.

You can say two donut to be cutesy i guess?

Very hard for me to tell when being cutesy is appropriate.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense.

If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not.

Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Don't they cancel each other out?

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] double_oh_walter@feddit.nu 3 points 9 months ago

Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that.

This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii.

Two sexy, sexy dingii

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, last thing I want is more attention while wearing those things and the chance that people will be able to hear the audio from the pr0n I'd be watching on it.

[–] muse@kbin.social 29 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The masturbating in public might be a dead give away too

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Oh shit... I wonder if they see me doing it now? This subway car seems pretty full, but no one's making eye contact... so I should be cool.

Actually, this makes me wonder if the Vision Pro would register your strokes as inputs while you were trying to do the deed?

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yes. And if you’re connected to the internet you’ll start summoning demons.

[–] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Public? No officer, i was masturbating on the moon!

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Nono you can send out a signal to everyone else's Vision Pro to hide what you're doing with your hands. You'll be totally in private!

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

NY post is awful. Deliberately misconstrued this Reddit thread for clickbait.

Web based vr pron works.

https://www.reddit.com/r/oculusnsfw/comments/1ahffm0/anyone_figured_out_porn_on_the_vision_pro/

Sideloading apps is also easy.

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 1 points 9 months ago

Ah, my bad. Thanks for the correction!

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The porn thing is overblown - it’s only about VR porn. You can watch all the porn you want in a video player or web browser. However people who don’t like Apple eagerly ate up this news, as if Apple banned porn on the device somehow.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Where there's a will, there's porn. You can watch porn on any Apple device now. The issue I believe they're calling out is a formatting issue with some video formats that porn uses, but that can be fixed with some conversions and probably more depends on 3rd party apps, which will likely show up at some point if they're not already there.

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Its a 3500 dollar computer you wear on your face, that can only perform basic computing tasks which can more cheaply be performed on a cell phone, draws enormous amounts of attention to the user when used in public spaces, and both the ability to use it in public spaces and the attention drawing nature of it are marketed as pros.

Ok, so its now exceedingly clear that anyone who would get this thing is a wealthy idiot who has 0 experience with an impoverished community, as if you walked through a poorer area, you would just get mugged and have this high value device stolen from you.

And frankly at this point I would morally support that happening.

Not that it likely will, as anyone both dumb amd rich enough to have this happen to them generally has no kind of on foot commute through any such impoverished area.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Yep, no chance I'm drawing that much attention to myself.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

The creator of the Apollo app recently tooted about wearing his out in public, getting noticed, and then secreting away to his hotel because the attention made him uncomfortable.

I’m probably more of an Apple fan than I like, but I can’t imagine owning one of these, let alone wearing it out in public.
It seems like Apple kind of forgot that good tech should first be good tech. They’re leaning heavy on this being a lifestyle item, but like - there’s no lifestyle out there that hinges on looking like boring versions of the guy from ready player one.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

@christianselig@mastodon.social

Made the mistake of wearing the Vision Pro at a coworking space and some youths saw it through the window and started yelling “YOOOOO Vision Pro!! yoooooo” so now I’m going to my hotel

lmao, poor guy.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That makes sense... he's a fairly normal person. I could see using the Vision Pro at a co-working place anyway, especially for someone who's an iOS app developer.

It does seem like an oddly clunky device by Apple standards. I don't find the overall idea abhorrent and could picture owning one down the road - perhaps after they've had a few years to make the device smaller and less expensive. I have no idea what I'd use it for though. Maybe once there are more exciting games than repackaged mobile games like Super Mega Fruit Ninja.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

Oh, yeah. More power to him. A later post by him said that the app he’s developing for it has already paid for the cost of the headset. I fully believe he’s just out there working.

I’m hoping in a few generations, when they’ve got the form factor worked out, and the price under control, that it’ll be more to my liking.
I don’t think I would ever want to interact with someone while wearing it, but it could be great for all the things VR is great for, but without the creepy Facebook privacy invasion. (I know - Apple is slipping down that slope, too. They’re just not as far down it yet.)

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

boring versions of the guy from ready player one.

Feels like there's some redundancy here.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And it'll get snatched from you faster than an iphone

[–] fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 9 months ago

Simple solution. Kensington lock attached to the gonads. The device can helpfully warn others against theft with an LED projection on the wearer saying Big Cojone Security is active.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I want it like crazy. No chance I'll wear it in public after I pull the trigger.

I probably would throw it in my backpack on hikes to do some captures of stuff like waterfalls and nice mountain views. They're really nice and not something you can do with my regular camera.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How does that work? Does it stitch together panoramas?

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So I asked, and you can't do captures to use for the backgrounds with the headset (I'm guessing they use better equipment and maybe some processing), but it does do "spatial photos and video". That was part of the demo in the store and they're really impressive. The 15 pro can also capture a 3D video that still looks cool, but has noticeably less depth than the captures with the headset.

I'm not sure the exact technical details, but there are a whole bunch of cameras and other sensors. I'm assuming it uses all of them combined to capture the 3D photos. But there was a lot of depth in the version I saw in the demo.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That’s why I bought one. To record spatial videos. I already tried it and without the straps (which pop off easily) you just pick it up and hold it like a camera, record video with your hands on it like a camcorder, then put it back down. It’s very much like just putting an old school camcorder to your eye for a few seconds. And there is no way in hell I’m wearing it in public except on an airplane maybe