this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
863 points (97.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

19821 readers
805 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If it's a 16-bit integer platform, it might hit every once in a while.

If it's a 32-bit integer platform, it'll hit very rarely.

If it's a 64-bit integer platform, someone would have to do the math with some reasonable assumptions, but I wouldn't be surprised if it would never hit before the universe becomes nothing but black holes.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The point being made is that it also depends how often the 'true' value gets used in the code. Tests might only evaluate it a few times per run, or they could cause billions of evaluations per run. You can't know the probability of a test failure without knowing the occurrence rate of that expression.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes you're correct, this was the point I was making.

To elaborate: could be 100s of times in a codebase, even 1000s, being executed in tests on local machines and build servers 100s of times a day, etc. etc.

[–] themusicman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

But it would hit a different place every time... Most developers wouldn't even consider checking for this, and the chance of getting a repro in a debugger is slim to none