worldnews

4836 readers

1 users here now

Rules:

Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.
No racism or bigotry.
Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.
Post titles should be the same as the article title.
No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Rooki@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

214

New Zealand repeals world-first smoking ban passed by Jacinda Ardern (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.world

172 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Reversal of smoking ban criticised as ‘shameful’ for lacking evidence

New Zealand is repealing the world’s first smoking ban passed under former prime minister Jacinda Arden’s government to pave the way for a smoke-free generation amid backlash from researchers and campaigners over its risk to Indigenous people.

The new coalition government led by prime minister Christopher Luxon confirmed the repeal will happen on Tuesday, delivering on one of the actions of his coalition’s ambitious 100-day plan.

The government repeal will be put before parliament as a matter of urgency, enabling it to scrap the law without seeking public comment, in line with previously announced plans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But in this case, it was telling cancer-stick merchants that they can't kill people, and then their victims rushed to their defense.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, because those people don't like being told what they can't do. The thing they can't do, in this case, is buy cigarettes.

[–] quafeinum@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So what? If they were old enough to buy fags before the ban they could still do so. They argue that their children have a right to lung cancer.

They are also told to wear a seatbelt and don’t rail against that.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Some people do, actually. Look, I'm not trying to argue their position for them, I'm not one of those people.