this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
45 points (97.9% liked)

Games

16742 readers
901 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)

This genuinely surprises me. After all the negative press, it still seemed to do well with gamers. I thought it may have actually been okay.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Arkham knight has consistently had higher concurrent daily players on steam than suicide squad after like, a week from launch, and that game is ten years old.

It didn't even reach Avengers numbers.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Have you seen the steam stats? Very few people played this game.

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I just remember reading steam reviews a few days after release and they were largely very positive. I was surprised.

I’m not trying to sell anyone on the game, I don’t own it, never played it, despise games as a live service.

I just remember all the negative reviews then seeing it seem to land fairly well with players who bought in. Could have been the investment principle and nothing else.

[–] Dragonmind@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

That's also because they deleted thousands of negative reviews. I think the numbers was like 7,400? 7.5? There's a review talking about it.

[–] Philycheezstake@lemmy.one 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is all anecdotal anyway but I know more people who played Anthem than SSKTJL

[–] MrJukes@lemmy.today 4 points 8 months ago

I loved Anthem...I wish they would bring it back.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m curious as to where you got that impression, I wasn’t sure if anyone even really played it

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 5 points 8 months ago

The current benchmark of “bad” is Golem or that other studio that immediately shut down after releasing their title that had something to do with zombie survival MMO.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago

I dont know, Ive been seeing posts on 4chan on it all the time, and the user numbers playing it seems really pitiful for a game from Rocksteady. To the point where there was more people playing Arkham than they were playing this.