this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
-17 points (28.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29707 readers
1748 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Adolf Hitler has been called the most documented human in history though

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

He's not really known for being a bad leader, to be fair. Kind of the opposite. A bad leader wouldn't have been able to rally an entire country to commit genocide.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

So you mean "those with the least ability to lead". Yet Trump is still somehow running and he can't even wipe his own ass.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes he is. His military decision making was thankfully shit, his hatred of Jews caused a brain drain ahead of the war; nuclear research wasn’t prioritized because it was considered a “Jewish science”. Also his rearmament of Germany was completely unsustainable and would have collapsed the German economy if not for the onset of the war. Effective demagoguery =/= successful leadership.

If I set out to make a thousand year empire that only lasted 11 years would you consider that successful leadership?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He was great at leading them to lose. I am only defining leadership in the sense of "leading people." He was great at that. Just not at tactics or strategy or sane ideas.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so to be clear, your critera for "great" leadership doesn't include any sort of decision-making skills nor effective delegation when said leader is out of their depth?

If I worked at a company that had leaders making a long series of bad calls at a tactical and/or strategic level, for instance, I shouldn't call that "bad leadership"?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 8 months ago

You're overanalyzing a comment intended to be humorous, dude.

[–] ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I was thinking about the future. Think of a cornered Hitler with access to hydrogen bombs.